Clinical safety and anticoagulation efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparins in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single medical center experience.

BACKGROUND

In many countries low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are increasingly used for hemodialysis (HD). Low-range activated clotting time (ACT-LR) values and anti-Xa activity had been used to monitor the degree of anticoagulation caused by LMWH. However, the facilities are not easily available at most hospitals. Such data are limited in Taiwan.

METHODS

A total of 76 patients receiving maintenance HD were prospectively enrolled. The HD patients were randomized to receive either nadroparin or enoxaparin and checked the ACT-LR values and anti-Xa activity. We aimed to analyze ACT-LR values and anti-Xa activity along with the clotting of the dialyzer or bleeding events associated with two LMWHs after they were administered. We also aimed to determine the dose necessary to reach maximum safety and efficacy.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in LMWH dosage, ACT-LR values, and anti-Xa activity between the two groups. There were no significant differences in bleeding/adverse events and extracorporeal circuit thrombosis between the two groups. Most of the bleeding and adverse events were subcutaneous minor bleeding. No major bleeding or mortality was found. We found significant differences in mean dosage, cost, bleeding/adverse effect, and extracorporeal circuit thrombosis between excessive and reduced nadroparin dosage groups.

CONCLUSION

LMWH is not still routinely used due to its high cost in Taiwan. In our clinical experience, nadroparin and enoxaparin exhibited high levels of safety and efficacy in chronic HD patients. Reduced LMWHs dosage could promote patient's safety and decreased HD cost in HD patients with excessive dosage of LMWHs.