Suppr超能文献

[西班牙艾滋病研究与治疗协作组(GESIDA)首选初始抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的成本及成本效益分析]

[Costs and cost effectiveness analysis of preferred GESIDA regimens for initial antiretroviral therapy].

作者信息

Blasco Antonio Javier, Arribas José Ramón, Clotet Bonaventura, Domingo Pere, González-García Juan, López-Bernaldo Juan Carlos, Llibre Josep M, Lozano Fernando, Podzamczer Daniel, Santamaría Juan Miguel, Tuset Montserrat, Zamora Laura, Lázaro Pablo, Gatell Josep M

机构信息

Técnicas Avanzadas de Investigación en Servicios de Salud (TAISS), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2011 Dec;29(10):721-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

GESIDA (AIDS Study Group) and the National AIDS Plan panel of experts propose "preferred regimens" of antiretroviral treatment (ART) as initial therapy in HIV infected patients. These preferred regimens are based on the results of clinical trials, and on the opinions of the experts of the panel. The objective of this study is to evaluate the costs and the cost effectiveness of initiating treatment following these guidelines.

METHODS

Economic assessment of costs and cost effectiveness through the construction of decision trees. Effectiveness was defined as the probability of having viral load <50 copies/mL at week 48 in an intention-to-treat analysis. The perspective of the analysis is that of the National Health System, taking into account only the differential direct costs (ART, management of adverse effects, studies of resistance, and determination of HLA B * 5701). The area is Spain, the time horizon is 48 weeks, and the costs are those of 2011. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed, building three scenarios for each regimen: baseline, the most favourable, and the most unfavourable.

RESULTS

In the baseline scenario, the cost of initiating treatment ranges from 7,550 Euros for the ABC/3TC+EFV to 13,327 Euros for TDF/FTC+RAL. The efficacy ranges between 0.66 for ABC/3TC+LPV/r and 0.86 for TDF/FTC+RAL. Efficiency, in terms of cost effectiveness, varies between 10,175 and 15,539 Euros per responder at 48 weeks, for TDF/FTC/EFV and TDF/FTC+RAL respectively.

CONCLUSION

The most efficient regimen was TDF/FTC+EFV, followed by ABC/3TC+EFV. Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of these findings.

摘要

引言

西班牙艾滋病研究协作组(GESIDA)和国家艾滋病计划专家小组提出了抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的“首选方案”,作为HIV感染患者的初始治疗方案。这些首选方案基于临床试验结果以及专家小组的意见。本研究的目的是评估遵循这些指南开始治疗的成本和成本效益。

方法

通过构建决策树对成本和成本效益进行经济评估。有效性定义为在意向性治疗分析中第48周病毒载量<50拷贝/毫升的概率。分析视角为国家卫生系统,仅考虑直接成本差异(抗逆转录病毒治疗、不良反应管理、耐药性研究以及HLA B*5701检测)。研究地区为西班牙,时间跨度为48周,成本为2011年的成本。进行了确定性敏感性分析,为每种方案构建了三种情景:基线情景、最有利情景和最不利情景。

结果

在基线情景下,开始治疗的成本从ABC/3TC+EFV方案的7550欧元到TDF/FTC+RAL方案的13327欧元不等。疗效范围在ABC/3TC+LPV/r方案的0.66至TDF/FTC+RAL方案的0.86之间。就成本效益而言,48周时每例有反应者的效率在TDF/FTC/EFV方案和TDF/FTC+RAL方案中分别为10175至15539欧元。

结论

最有效的方案是TDF/FTC+EFV,其次是ABC/3TC+EFV。敏感性分析证实了这些结果的稳健性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验