Blasco Antonio Javier, Llibre Josep M, Arribas José Ramón, Boix Vicente, Clotet Bonaventura, Domingo Pere, González-García Juan, Knobel Hernando, López Juan Carlos, Lozano Fernando, Miró José M, Podzamczer Daniel, Santamaría Juan Miguel, Tuset Montserrat, Zamora Laura, Lázaro Pablo, Gatell Josep M
Técnicas Avanzadas de Investigación en Servicios de Salud (TAISS), Madrid, España.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2013 Nov;31(9):568-78. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
The GESIDA and National AIDS Plan panel of experts have proposed "preferred regimens" of antiretroviral treatment (ART) as initial therapy in HIV infected patients for 2013. The objective of this study is to evaluate the costs and effectiveness of initiating treatment with these "preferred regimens".
An economic assessment of costs and effectiveness (cost/effectiveness) was performed using decision tree analysis models. Effectiveness was defined as the probability of having viral load <50copies/mL at week48, in an intention-to-treat analysis. Cost of initiating treatment with an ART regime was defined as the costs of ART and its consequences (adverse effects, changes of ART regime and drug resistance analyses) during the first 48weeks. The perspective of the analysis is that of the National Health System was applied, only taking into account differential direct costs: ART (official prices), management of adverse effects, resistance studies, and determination of HLA B*5701. The setting is Spain and the costs are those of 2013. A sensitivity deterministic analysis was performed, constructing three scenarios for each regimen: baseline, most favourable, and most unfavourable cases.
In the baseline case scenario, the cost of initiating treatment ranges from 6,747euros for TDF/FTC+NVP to 12,059euros for TDF/FTC+RAL. The effectiveness ranges between 0.66 for ABC/3TC+LPV/r and ABC/3TC+ATV/r, and 0.87 for TDF/FTC+RAL and ABC/3TC+RAL. Effectiveness, in terms of cost/effectiveness, varies between 8,396euros and 13,930euros per responder at 48weeks, for TDF/FTC/RPV and TDF/FTC+RAL, respectively.
Taking ART at official prices, the most effective regimen was TDF/FTC/RPV, followed by the rest of non-nucleoside containing regimens. The sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of these findings.
西班牙艾滋病研究与治疗协作组(GESIDA)和国家艾滋病计划专家小组已提出2013年针对HIV感染患者初始治疗的抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)“优选方案”。本研究的目的是评估采用这些“优选方案”启动治疗的成本和效果。
使用决策树分析模型进行成本和效果(成本/效果)的经济评估。在意向性分析中,效果定义为第48周时病毒载量<50拷贝/mL的概率。采用ART方案启动治疗的成本定义为前48周内ART及其后果(不良反应、ART方案变更和耐药性分析)的成本。分析视角采用国家卫生系统,仅考虑差异直接成本:ART(官方价格)、不良反应管理、耐药性研究以及HLA B*5701检测。研究背景为西班牙,成本为2013年的成本。进行了敏感性确定性分析,为每种方案构建三种情景:基线情景、最有利情景和最不利情景。
在基线情景下,启动治疗的成本从替诺福韦酯/恩曲他滨+奈韦拉平(TDF/FTC+NVP)的6747欧元到替诺福韦酯/恩曲他滨+拉替拉韦(TDF/FTC+RAL)的12059欧元不等。效果在阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定+洛匹那韦/利托那韦(ABC/3TC+LPV/r)和阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定+阿扎那韦/利托那韦(ABC/3TC+ATV/r)之间为0.66,在替诺福韦酯/恩曲他滨+拉替拉韦(TDF/FTC+RAL)和阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定+拉替拉韦(ABC/3TC+RAL)之间为0.87。就成本/效果而言,替诺福韦酯/恩曲他滨/利匹韦林(TDF/FTC/RPV)和替诺福韦酯/恩曲他滨+拉替拉韦(TDF/FTC+RAL)在第48周时每位有反应者的成本/效果分别在8396欧元和13930欧元之间。
按官方价格计算ART,最有效的方案是替诺福韦酯/恩曲他滨/利匹韦林(TDF/FTC/RPV),其次是其他不含核苷类的方案。敏感性分析证实了这些结果的稳健性。