Division of Cardiology, University Clinic or Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Colnik, Colnik, Slovenia.
Respir Med. 2011 Oct;105 Suppl 1:S44-9. doi: 10.1016/S0954-6111(11)70010-5.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently coexists in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and is a key factor for beta blocker underprescription and underdosing. This study compared effects of bisoprolol and carvedilol in patients with both conditions.
This was a randomized open-label study, of bisoprolol and carvedilol during initiation and uptitration to target or maximal tolerated dose. Pulmonary function testing, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide were measured at baseline and follow-up.
We randomized 63 elderly patients (73 ± 9 years, 81% men, left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 7%) with mild to moderate CHF (54% New York Heart Assocation class II) and moderate to severe COPD (76% Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage 2). Target dose was tolerated by 31 (49%) patients and 19 (30%) patients experienced adverse events during follow-up (19% bisoprolol, 42% carvedilol, p = 0.045). Study medication had to be withdrawn in 8 (13%) patients (bisoprolol: 2 due to hypotension, 1 due to bradycardia; carvedilol: 2 due to hypotension and 1 due to wheezing, dyspnoea, and oedema, respectively). Forced expiratory volume in 1(st) second significantly increased in bisoprolol (1561 ± 414 ml to 1698 ± 519 ml, p = 0.046) but not carvedilol (1704 ± 484 to 1734 ± 548, p = 0.44) group. Both agents reduced heart rate (bisoprolol: 75 ± 14 to 68 ± 10, p = 0.007; carvedilol 78 ± 14 to 72 ± 12, p = 0.016) and had no effect on N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide.
Beta blockers frequently caused adverse events, and thus 49% of patients could tolerate the target dose. Bisoprolol induced demonstrable improvement in pulmonary function and caused less adverse events.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)常与慢性心力衰竭(CHF)并存,是β受体阻滞剂处方不足和剂量不足的关键因素。本研究比较了这两种药物在两种疾病患者中的疗效。
这是一项随机、开放标签的研究,在起始和滴定至目标或最大耐受剂量时使用比索洛尔和卡维地洛。在基线和随访时测量肺功能测试、12 导联心电图和 N 末端脑利钠肽前体。
我们随机选择了 63 名年龄较大的患者(73±9 岁,81%为男性,左心室射血分数 33±7%),这些患者患有轻度至中度 CHF(54%为纽约心脏协会 II 级)和中重度 COPD(76%为全球慢性阻塞性肺病倡议 2 期)。31 名(49%)患者耐受目标剂量,19 名(30%)患者在随访期间出现不良反应(比索洛尔 19%,卡维地洛 42%,p=0.045)。8 名(13%)患者不得不停用研究药物(比索洛尔:2 名因低血压,1 名因心动过缓;卡维地洛:2 名因低血压,1 名因喘息、呼吸困难和水肿)。与卡维地洛组相比,比索洛尔组的第一秒用力呼气量显著增加(1561±414 毫升至 1698±519 毫升,p=0.046),但卡维地洛组没有增加(1704±484 毫升至 1734±548 毫升,p=0.44)。两种药物均降低了心率(比索洛尔:75±14 次/分至 68±10 次/分,p=0.007;卡维地洛:78±14 次/分至 72±12 次/分,p=0.016),且对 N 末端脑利钠肽前体无影响。
β受体阻滞剂经常引起不良反应,因此 49%的患者能够耐受目标剂量。比索洛尔可明显改善肺功能,且不良反应较少。