Université de Provence, Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille Cedex 1, France.
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Dec;49(14):3870-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
Two experiments assessed if non-human primates can be meaningfully compared to humans in a non-verbal test of serial recall. A procedure was used that was derived from variations of the Corsi test, designed to test the effects of sequence structure and movement path length in humans. Two baboons were tested in Experiment 1. The monkeys showed several attributes of human serial recall. These included an easier recall of sequences with a shorter number of items and of sequences characterized by a shorter path length when the number of items was kept constant. However, the accuracy and speed of processing did not indicate that the monkeys were able to benefit from the spatiotemporal structure of sequences. Humans tested in Experiment 2 showed a quantitatively longer memory span, and, in contrast with monkeys, benefitted from sequence structure. The results are discussed in relation to differences in how human and non-human primates segment complex visual patterns.
两项实验评估了非人类灵长类动物在非言语序列回忆测试中是否可以与人类进行有意义的比较。使用了一种源自 Corsi 测试变体的程序,旨在测试序列结构和人类运动路径长度的影响。在实验 1 中测试了两只狒狒。猴子表现出了人类序列回忆的几个特征。这些特征包括在保持项目数量不变的情况下,较短项目数量的序列和较短路径长度的序列更容易被回忆起来。然而,处理的准确性和速度并不表明猴子能够受益于序列的时空结构。在实验 2 中测试的人类表现出定量上更长的记忆跨度,并且与猴子相反,他们受益于序列结构。结果与人类和非人类灵长类动物如何分割复杂视觉模式的差异有关。