Suppr超能文献

Differences in side effects between a conventional carbamazepine preparation and a slow-release preparation of carbamazepine.

作者信息

Persson L I, Ben-Menachem E, Bengtsson E, Heinonen E

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Göteborg, Sahlgren Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 1990 Jul;6(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(90)90088-d.

Abstract

The aim of this double-blind cross-over study was to investigate whether side effects of carbamazepine (CBZ) could be reduced by using a slow-release CBZ preparation. Twenty-one adult patients with epilepsy who had side effects related to the use of CBZ took part in the trial. Patients were randomized to receive either a conventional (C) or slow-release (SR) CBZ preparation for 3 months and were then switched over to the other preparation for another 3 months. The daily dose and dosing frequency of CBZ were kept the same as before the study. The quality and severity of side effects were assessed monthly using a scored questionnaire containing questions about systemic toxicity (STRS) and neurotoxicity (NTRS). Twenty patients could be evaluated. The mean total values of NTRS of 3 monthly visits on each drug were significantly less during SR than during C treatment (P less than 0.05). All the items of NTRS scored lower during SR therapy, and the difference was significant for the occurrence of headache, dizziness and disturbances of vision, speech and coordination. The total score of STRS was also lower during SR, but the difference was not significant. Eleven patients preferred SR, 3 preferred C and 6 patients estimated the periods to be equal. In conclusion, a slow-release preparation of CBZ can render fewer side effects than conventional CBZ preparations.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验