Connolly Martin J, Kenealy Timothy, Barber P Alan, Carswell Peter, Clinton Janet, Dyall Lorna, Devlin Gerard, Doughty Robert N, Kerse Ngaire, Kolbe John, Lawrenson Ross, Moffitt Allan, Sheridan Nicolette
Geriatric Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
N Z Med J. 2011 Oct 14;124(1344):16-35.
Chronic illness is the leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and inequitable health outcomes in New Zealand. The ABCCNZ Stocktake aimed to identify extent of long-term conditions management evidence-based practices in stroke, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure in New Zealand's District Health Boards (DHBs).
Eleven 'dimensions' of care for long-term conditions, identified by literature review and confirmed at workshops with long-term conditions professionals, formed the basis of the Stocktake of all 21 DHBs. It comprised two questionnaires: a generic component capturing perceptions of practice; and a disease-specific component assessing service provision.
Fifteen DHBs completed all or parts of the questionnaires. Data accrual was completed in July 2008. Although most DHBs had developed long-term conditions management strategies to a moderate degree, there was considerable variability of practice between DHBs. DHBs thought their PHOs had developed strategies in some areas to a low to moderate level, though cardiovascular disease provision rated more highly. Regarding disease-specific services, larger DHBs had greater long-term conditions management provision not only of tertiary services, but of standard care, leadership, self-management, case-management, and audit.
There is considerable variability in perceptions of long-term conditions management service provision across DHBs. In many instances variability in actual disease-specific service provision appears to relate to DHB size.
慢性病是新西兰发病、死亡及健康结果不平等的主要原因。新西兰ABC(具体含义未明确)盘点旨在确定新西兰地区卫生委员会(DHBs)在中风、心血管疾病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和充血性心力衰竭方面长期病症管理循证实践的程度。
通过文献综述确定并经长期病症专业人员在研讨会上确认的11个长期病症护理“维度”,构成了对所有21个DHBs进行盘点的基础。它包括两份问卷:一份通用部分用于收集对实践的看法;一份疾病特定部分用于评估服务提供情况。
15个DHBs完成了全部或部分问卷。数据收集于2008年7月完成。尽管大多数DHBs在一定程度上制定了长期病症管理策略,但各DHBs之间的实践存在很大差异。DHBs认为其初级卫生组织(PHOs)在某些领域制定的策略处于低到中等水平,不过心血管疾病方面的服务评价更高。关于特定疾病服务,规模较大的DHBs不仅在三级服务方面,而且在标准护理、领导力、自我管理、病例管理和审计方面,长期病症管理服务提供更多。
各DHBs对长期病症管理服务提供的看法存在很大差异。在许多情况下,实际特定疾病服务提供的差异似乎与DHBs的规模有关。