Instituto de Humanidades, Artes & Ciências, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Sociol Health Illn. 2012 Jun;34(5):651-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01407.x. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
This article originates from an online ethnography on barebacking (intentional unprotected anal sex) in Brazil, between the years 2004 and 2008. More specifically, some elements or conceptual dimensions present in discussions on barebacking will be examined. Based on internet discussion forums and 23 open online interviews, using the Windows Live Messenger program, it was possible to organise the practice of barebacking into two principal modalities: more extensive and involving greater contact and partial or involving reduced risks. The individuals who practise bareback sex may experience situations that include various forms of barebacking during their lives, such as the men who contract HIV and try to develop strategies to reduce the risks in their sexual interactions by, for example, avoiding ejaculating inside their partner or trying to establish sexual relationships with men of the same serological status. Therefore, in general, the different motivations for barebacking constitute a frontier region (of tension) between the pleasure of sensory contact and the risk of infection. Beyond producing a dichotomy between pleasure and risk, the various meanings described by the potential barebackers must be taken into account.
这篇文章源于 2004 年至 2008 年间巴西进行的一项关于无保护肛交(故意无保护的肛交)的在线民族志研究。更具体地说,本文将研究无保护肛交讨论中存在的一些要素或概念维度。基于互联网讨论论坛和 23 次开放式在线访谈,使用 Windows Live Messenger 程序,我们将无保护肛交的实践分为两种主要模式:更广泛的模式,涉及更多的接触和部分模式,涉及降低风险。从事无保护性行为的人可能会在他们的生活中经历各种形式的无保护肛交,例如感染艾滋病毒的男性试图通过避免在伴侣体内射精或试图与具有相同血清学状态的男性建立性关系来降低性接触中的风险,以此来减少感染风险。因此,总的来说,无保护肛交的不同动机构成了感官接触的乐趣和感染风险之间的紧张前沿(区域)。除了在快乐和风险之间产生二分法之外,还必须考虑潜在的无保护者所描述的各种含义。