Suppr超能文献

左炔诺孕酮用于排卵前或排卵后紧急避孕的避孕效果。

Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation.

机构信息

Instituto Chileno de Medicina Reproductiva, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):486-92. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.006. Epub 2011 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraceptive pills containing levonorgestrel (LNG-EC) has been estimated in most previous studies by judging the day of ovulation from presumptive menstrual cycle data, thus providing poorly reliable estimates.

METHODS

In the present study, the efficacy of LNG-EC was determined in 393 cycles by dating ovulation on the basis of reliable hormonal and ovarian parameters validated by a database constructed in a separate study. In addition, the efficacy was determined separately for cycles in which LNG-EC was given before or after ovulation.

RESULTS

For the 148 women who had sexual intercourse during the fertile days, the overall accumulated probability of pregnancy was 24.7, while altogether 8 pregnancies were observed. Thus, the overall contraceptive efficacy of LNG-EC was 68%. Among the 103 women who took LNG-EC before ovulation (days -5 to -1), 16 pregnancies were expected and no pregnancy occurred (p<.0001). Among the 45 women who took LNG-EC on the day of ovulation (day 0) or thereafter, 8 pregnancies occurred and 8.7 were expected (p=1.00). These findings are incompatible with the inhibition of implantation by LNG-EC in women. The same cases were also analyzed using the presumptive menstrual cycle data, and important discrepancies were detected between the two methods.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of LNG-EC has been overestimated in studies using presumptive menstrual cycle data. Our results confirm previous similar studies and demonstrate that LNG-EC does not prevent embryo implantation and therefore cannot be labeled as abortifacient.

摘要

背景

在大多数先前的研究中,通过根据推测的月经周期数据判断排卵日,来评估含左炔诺孕酮(LNG-EC)的紧急避孕药的避孕效果,因此提供的估计值不太可靠。

方法

在本研究中,通过基于在单独研究中构建的数据库验证的可靠激素和卵巢参数来确定 393 个周期中 LNG-EC 的功效。此外,还分别确定了在排卵前或排卵后给予 LNG-EC 的周期中的功效。

结果

对于在生育期进行性行为的 148 名女性,怀孕的累积总体概率为 24.7%,而总共观察到 8 例妊娠。因此,LNG-EC 的总体避孕效果为 68%。在 103 名排卵前(-5 至-1 天)服用 LNG-EC 的女性中,预计会有 16 例妊娠,但未发生妊娠(p<.0001)。在 45 名在排卵日(0 天)或之后服用 LNG-EC 的女性中,发生了 8 例妊娠,预计会有 8.7 例(p=1.00)。这些发现与 LNG-EC 在女性中抑制着床的作用不一致。使用推测的月经周期数据也对相同的病例进行了分析,并在两种方法之间检测到了重要差异。

结论

使用推测的月经周期数据的研究中,LNG-EC 的功效被高估了。我们的结果证实了以前的类似研究,并表明 LNG-EC 不能防止胚胎着床,因此不能将其标记为堕胎药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验