Department of Legal Medicine, Forensic and Pharmacotoxicological Science, University of Pavia, Italy.
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 May 10;218(1-3):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
Hair testing for drugs of abuse is performed in Lombardy by eleven analytical laboratories accredited for forensic purposes, the most frequent purposes being driving license regranting and workplace drug testing. Individuals undergoing hair testing for these purposes can choose the laboratory in which the analyses have to be carried out. The aim of our study was to perform an interlaboratory exercise in order to verify the level of standardization of hair testing for drugs of abuse in these accredited laboratories; nine out of the eleven laboratories participated in this exercise. Sixteen hair strands coming from different subjects were longitudinally divided in 3-4 aliquots and distributed to participating laboratories, which were requested to apply their routine methods. All the participants analyzed opiates (morphine and 6-acetylmorphine) and cocainics (cocaine and benzoylecgonine) while only six analyzed methadone and amphetamines (amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDMA, MDA and MDEA) and five Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The majority of the participants (seven labs) performed acidic hydrolysis to extract the drugs from the hair and analysis by GC-MS, while two labs used LC-MS/MS. Eight laboratories performed initial screening tests by Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique (EMIT), Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) or Cloned Enzyme Donor Immunoassay (CEDIA). Results demonstrated a good qualitative performance for all the participants, since no false positive results were reported by any of them. Quantitative data were quite scattered, but less in samples with low concentrations of analytes than in those with higher concentrations. Results from this first regional interlaboratory exercise show that, on the one hand, individuals undergoing hair testing would have obtained the same qualitative results in any of the nine laboratories. On the other hand, the scatter in quantitative results could cause some inequalities if any interpretation of the data is required.
毛发中毒品检测在伦巴第地区由 11 家经过法医认证的分析实验室进行,最常见的目的是重新发放驾驶执照和工作场所药物检测。出于这些目的接受毛发检测的个人可以选择进行分析的实验室。我们的研究目的是进行实验室间的实践,以验证这些经过认证的实验室中毛发中毒品检测的标准化程度;其中 9 家实验室参加了这项实践。16 根来自不同个体的毛发被纵向分成 3-4 等份并分发给参加实践的实验室,要求他们应用常规方法进行分析。所有参与者都分析了阿片类药物(吗啡和 6-乙酰吗啡)和可卡因类药物(可卡因和苯甲酰可卡因),而只有 6 家分析了美沙酮和苯丙胺类药物(苯丙胺、甲基苯丙胺、MDMA、MDA 和 MDEA)和 5 种大麻素(Δ(9)-四氢大麻酚(THC)。大多数参与者(7 个实验室)通过酸性水解从毛发中提取药物,并进行 GC-MS 分析,而 2 个实验室使用 LC-MS/MS。8 个实验室使用酶多重免疫测定技术(EMIT)、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)或克隆酶供体免疫测定(CEDIA)进行初始筛选测试。结果表明所有参与者的定性性能都很好,因为没有任何实验室报告假阳性结果。定量数据相当分散,但在分析物浓度较低的样本中比在浓度较高的样本中分散得少。这项首次区域实验室间实践的结果表明,一方面,接受毛发检测的个人在这 9 家实验室中的任何一家都将获得相同的定性结果。另一方面,如果需要对数据进行任何解释,定量结果的分散可能会导致一些不平等。