• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护中的撤机与放弃治疗。第1部分。社会与伦理层面。

Withdrawing and withholding treatment in intensive care. Part 1. Social and ethical dimensions.

作者信息

Fisher M M, Raper R F

机构信息

Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1990 Aug 20;153(4):217-20. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb136864.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb136864.x
PMID:2201889
Abstract

Intensive care is an expensive resource. The medical profession has been criticised for applying technology indiscriminately and at vast expense to a relatively small group of patients. The desire of governments to reduce the cost of health care has made rationing of health services a topic of open discussion rather than an implicit activity as it has been in the past. The appropriate response of doctors to these problems is to provide leadership in promoting public awareness and debate of the effects of rationing, and to provide rational allocation of therapy to individual patients. The major issues involving resource allocation in society and to individuals are discussed.

摘要

重症监护是一种昂贵的资源。医学界因不加区分且耗费巨资地将技术应用于相对少数的患者而受到批评。政府降低医疗保健成本的愿望使得医疗服务配给成为一个公开讨论的话题,而非像过去那样是一种隐性活动。医生对这些问题的恰当回应是在提高公众对配给影响的认识和促进相关辩论方面发挥引领作用,并为个体患者合理分配治疗。文中讨论了社会和个体层面涉及资源分配的主要问题。

相似文献

1
Withdrawing and withholding treatment in intensive care. Part 1. Social and ethical dimensions.重症监护中的撤机与放弃治疗。第1部分。社会与伦理层面。
Med J Aust. 1990 Aug 20;153(4):217-20. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb136864.x.
2
Withdrawing and withholding life support in geriatric surgical patients. Ethical considerations.老年外科患者生命支持的撤除与 withhold。伦理考量。 注:这里“withhold”常见释义为“拒绝给予;扣留”等,结合语境可能是指不给予某些生命支持措施,但准确意思还需结合更完整文本确定。
Surg Clin North Am. 1994 Apr;74(2):245-59.
3
Response to Roger W. Hunt.对罗杰·W·亨特的回应。
J Med Ethics. 1993 Mar;19(1):24-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.19.1.24.
4
An ethical assessment of intensive care.重症监护的伦理评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1992 Summer;8(3):408-18. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300013714.
5
Our discardable people.我们可抛弃之人。
Hum Life Rev. 1998 Summer;24(3):78-87.
6
Futility in practice.实践中的无意义性。
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Feb 22;153(4):437-41.
7
Ethical issues in withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.在停止和撤销维持生命治疗方面的伦理问题。
Indiana Med. 1992 May-Jun;85(3):218-21.
8
Ethical principles in critical care.重症监护中的伦理原则。
JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):696-700.
9
Consumer sovereignty vs. informed consent: saying no to requests to "do everything" for dying patients.消费者主权与知情同意:对为临终患者“不惜一切代价”的请求说“不”。
Bus Prof Ethics J. 1990 Fall-Winter;9(3 and 4):95-102.
10
Quality of life judgments and medical indications.生活质量判断与医学指征。
Qual Life Cardiovasc Care. 1986 Spring;2(3):113-8.

引用本文的文献

1
ICU Cornestone: a lecture that changed my practice.重症监护病房基石:一场改变我临床实践的讲座。
Crit Care. 2002 Oct;6(5):403-4. doi: 10.1186/cc1536. Epub 2002 Jul 9.
2
Limitation of life support: frequency and practice in a London and a Cape Town intensive care unit.生命支持的限制:伦敦和开普敦重症监护病房的频率及实践
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Oct;22(10):1020-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01699222.