• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 3.0TMR 成像上用弥散加权成像评价肝癌化疗栓塞的治疗反应。

Evaluation of treatment response of chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with diffusion-weighted imaging on 3.0-T MR imaging.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.08.030. Epub 2011 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2011.08.030
PMID:22019180
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial chemoembolization with diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with a 3-T system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2010 and November 2010, 74 patients were treated with chemoembolization in our interventional radiology unit. Twenty-two patients (29%) who had liver MR imaging including diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging on a 3-T system before and after transarterial chemoembolization were evaluated retrospectively. Tumor size, arterial enhancement, venous washout, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of lesions, peritumoral parenchyma, normal liver parenchyma, and spleen were recorded before and after treatment. The significance of differences between ADC values of responding and nonresponding lesions was calculated.

RESULTS

The study included 77 HCC lesions (mean diameter, 31.4 mm) in 20 patients. There was no significant reduction in mean tumor diameter after treatment. Reduction in tumor enhancement in the arterial phase was statistically significant (P = .01). Tumor ADC value increased from 1.10 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s to 1.27 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s after treatment (P < .01), whereas the ADC values for liver and spleen remained unchanged. ADC values from cellular parts of the tumor and necrotic areas also increased after treatment. However, pretreatment ADC values were not reliable to identify responding lesions according to the results of receiver operating characteristic analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

After transarterial chemoembolization, responding HCC lesions exhibited decreases in arterial enhancement and increases in ADC values in cellular and necrotic areas. Pretreatment ADC values were not predictive of response to chemoembolization.

摘要

目的

使用 3T 系统的弥散加权成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像评估经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效。

材料与方法

2010 年 2 月至 2010 年 11 月,在我们的介入放射学单位进行了化疗栓塞治疗的 74 名患者。对 22 名(29%)患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在经动脉化疗栓塞前后均进行了包括弥散和动态对比增强磁共振成像的肝脏磁共振成像检查。记录治疗前后病变、肿瘤周围实质、正常肝实质和脾脏的肿瘤大小、动脉增强、静脉洗脱和表观扩散系数(ADC)值。计算了病变 ADC 值与治疗反应之间的差异的显著性。

结果

该研究包括 20 名患者的 77 个 HCC 病变(平均直径 31.4mm)。治疗后肿瘤平均直径无明显缩小。动脉期肿瘤增强减少具有统计学意义(P=0.01)。肿瘤 ADC 值从治疗前的 1.10×10(-3)mm(2)/s 增加到 1.27×10(-3)mm(2)/s(P<0.01),而肝脏和脾脏的 ADC 值保持不变。肿瘤细胞区和坏死区的 ADC 值也在治疗后增加。然而,根据受试者工作特征分析的结果,治疗前的 ADC 值不能可靠地识别反应性病变。

结论

经动脉化疗栓塞后,反应性 HCC 病变表现为动脉增强减少和细胞区及坏死区 ADC 值增加。治疗前的 ADC 值不能预测化疗栓塞的反应。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of treatment response of chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with diffusion-weighted imaging on 3.0-T MR imaging.在 3.0TMR 成像上用弥散加权成像评价肝癌化疗栓塞的治疗反应。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.08.030. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
2
Role of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating response after chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.磁共振弥散加权成像在评价肝癌化疗栓塞后反应中的作用。
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jul;75(1):e9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.040. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
3
The role of functional MR imaging in the assessment of tumor response after chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.功能磁共振成像在评估肝细胞癌患者化疗栓塞术后肿瘤反应中的作用。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006 Mar;17(3):505-12. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000200052.02183.92.
4
[Water mobility of diffusion MRI in prediction of response to chemoembolization in liver cancer].[扩散加权磁共振成像中的水分子扩散运动在预测肝癌化疗栓塞疗效中的应用]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Apr;31(4):293-7.
5
Assessment of metastatic breast cancer response to chemoembolization with contrast agent enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging.使用造影剂增强和扩散加权磁共振成像评估转移性乳腺癌对化疗栓塞的反应。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Aug;18(8):957-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.04.025.
6
Assessment of tumor necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after chemoembolization: diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced MRI with histopathologic correlation of the explanted liver.化疗栓塞后肝细胞癌肿瘤坏死的评估:扩散加权和对比增强MRI与移植肝组织病理学相关性研究
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1044-52. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1461.
7
Relationship of apparent diffusion coefficient to survival for patients with unresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma after chemoembolization.经化疗栓塞治疗后不可切除的原发性肝细胞癌患者的表观扩散系数与生存的关系。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Mar;81(3):472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.081. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
8
Role of functional magnetic resonance imaging in assessing metastatic leiomyosarcoma response to chemoembolization.功能磁共振成像在评估转移性平滑肌肉瘤对化疗栓塞反应中的作用。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 May-Jun;32(3):347-52. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318134ecd6.
9
[Evaluation of the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma with magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging: 4-6-week follow-up of 25 cases].[经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的磁共振扩散加权成像效果评估:25例患者4至6周随访]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Sep 16;88(35):2474-7.
10
Evaluating local hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence post-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: is diffusion-weighted MRI reliable as an indicator?评估经动脉化疗栓塞术后局部肝细胞癌复发情况:扩散加权磁共振成像作为指标是否可靠?
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Apr;27(4):834-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21316.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety, Efficacy and Distribution of Doxorubicin Loaded Radiopaque Beads in Chemoembolization in Intermediate Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with Correlation with Local Response.载有多柔比星的不透射线微球在中期肝细胞癌(HCC)化疗栓塞中的安全性、有效性、分布及其与局部反应的相关性
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Mar;46(3):337-349. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03346-1. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
Role of Functional MRI in Liver SBRT: Current Use and Future Directions.功能磁共振成像在肝脏立体定向放射治疗中的作用:当前应用与未来方向
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;14(23):5860. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235860.
3
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Therapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization.
表观扩散系数可预测肝细胞癌经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗的反应。
Dig Dis. 2022;40(5):596-606. doi: 10.1159/000520716. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
4
Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Hepatocellular Carcinoma as a Predictor of a Response to Cisplatin-Based Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.扩散加权磁共振成像在肝细胞癌中作为基于顺铂的肝动脉灌注化疗反应的预测指标
Front Oncol. 2020 Nov 19;10:600233. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.600233. eCollection 2020.
5
Prognostic Significance of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.表观弥散系数对立体定向消融放疗肝细胞癌患者的预后意义。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 2;9(1):14157. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50503-7.
6
MRI assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapy.局部区域治疗后肝细胞癌的磁共振成像评估
Insights Imaging. 2019 Jan 29;10(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0690-1.
7
Functional imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的功能成像
Hepat Oncol. 2016 Apr;3(2):137-153. doi: 10.2217/hep-2015-0005. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
8
Post Locoregional Therapy Treatment Imaging in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Literature-based Review.肝细胞癌患者局部区域治疗后的影像检查:基于文献的综述
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2018 Jun 28;6(2):189-197. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2017.00059. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
9
Baseline Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Predictor of Response to Liver-Directed Therapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.基线表观扩散系数作为肝细胞癌肝靶向治疗反应的预测指标
J Clin Med. 2018 Apr 14;7(4):83. doi: 10.3390/jcm7040083.
10
The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in Locoregional Therapy Outcome Prediction and Response Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): The New Era of Functional Imaging Biomarkers.弥散加权成像(DWI)在预测肝细胞癌(HCC)局部区域治疗结果和评估反应中的作用:功能成像生物标志物的新时代。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2015 Nov 30;5(4):546-63. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics5040546.