University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;90(12):1056-63. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31822deac9.
This study aimed to determine the anesthetic effect of 1-MHz phonophoresis using lidocaine on the anterior forearm following 5- and 10-min interventions.
This was a crossover study in a laboratory involving 22 healthy participants (13 women, 9 men; age, 23.0 ± 3.2 yrs; height, 169.1 ± 7.2 cm; weight, 70.9 ± 13.9 kg). All subjects received four interventions on four different days: (1) 1.5 W/cm, 100% duty cycle with lidocaine for 5 mins (short); (2) 1.5 W/cm, 50% duty cycle with lidocaine for 10 mins (long); (3) no ultrasound for 10 mins with lidocaine gel (lidocaine sham); and (4) no ultrasound for 10 mins with ultrasound gel (true sham). Skin sensation was measured for analysis. The main outcome measures were Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament (SWM) scores, with higher scores indicating less sensitivity.
There was a significant time main effect for SWM scores (P < 0.001). Baseline SWM scores were the lowest (3.00 ± .53; P ≤ 0.006) and post-SWM scores (0 mins) were the highest (3.63 ± .44; P < 0.001), indicating an anesthetic effect at this time.
Neither the long nor the short treatment decreased skin sensation compared with sham conditions. All interventions resulted in decreased skin sensation when comparing baseline SWM scores to all posttreatment scores. Phonophoresis with lidocaine did not result in an enhanced anaesthetic effect on human subjects.
本研究旨在确定 5 分钟和 10 分钟干预后,1MHz 超声电离子透入利多卡因在前臂的麻醉效果。
这是一项在实验室进行的交叉研究,涉及 22 名健康参与者(13 名女性,9 名男性;年龄 23.0 ± 3.2 岁;身高 169.1 ± 7.2cm;体重 70.9 ± 13.9kg)。所有受试者在 4 天内接受 4 种干预措施:(1)1.5W/cm,利多卡因 100%占空比 5 分钟(短);(2)1.5W/cm,利多卡因 50%占空比 10 分钟(长);(3)利多卡因凝胶无超声 10 分钟(利多卡因假);(4)无超声凝胶 10 分钟(真假)。测量皮肤感觉进行分析。主要观察指标为 Semmes-Weinstein 单丝(SWM)评分,分数越高表示敏感性越低。
SWM 评分有显著的时间主效应(P < 0.001)。基线 SWM 评分最低(3.00 ±.53;P ≤ 0.006),SWM 评分(0 分钟)最高(3.63 ±.44;P < 0.001),表明此时具有麻醉效果。
与假处理相比,长处理和短处理均未降低皮肤感觉。与基线 SWM 评分相比,所有干预措施的 SWM 评分均降低,表明所有干预措施均降低皮肤感觉。利多卡因超声电离子透入对人体受试者未产生增强的麻醉效果。