Suppr超能文献

诱导化疗联合同期放化疗治疗局部晚期头颈部癌患者的毒性谱和临床结局。

Toxicity profile and clinical outcomes in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with induction chemotherapy prior to concurrent chemoradiation.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Oncol Rep. 2012 Feb;27(2):467-74. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1512. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

Abstract

The use of induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) remains controversial. We explored whether toxicity from induction chemotherapy influenced the delivery of concurrent chemoradiation. Among 171 consecutive previously unirradiated patients with HNSCC treated with combined chemotherapy and radiation, we identified 66 patients with stage III-IVB head and neck carcinoma who were treated with induction chemotherapy prior to planned chemoradiation. The most common induction regimen was docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU (TPF; 80%) for 2 to 3 cycles. Mean radiation dose was 72 Gy (range, 36-75 Gy). Concurrent chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin (26%), cetuximab (5%) and 5-fluorouracil/hydroxyurea (65%)-based regimens. At a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 9-56 months), the 2-year locoregional control and distant control rates were 85 and 86%, respectively. The 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 74 and 80%, respectively. Although there were no grade 5 toxicities during induction chemotherapy, 26% of patients required hospitalization for adverse events, including 5% needing intensive care. The most common high grade adverse events were grade 4 neutropenia (21%) and neutropenic fever (17%). Six percent of patients were unable to tolerate concurrent chemotherapy. The 2-year disease-free survival was significantly higher in patients able to complete induction and concurrent chemoradiation as planned (83 vs. 27%, p<0.001). Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation results in promising survival rates in our cohort of advanced head and neck carcinoma patients. Due to severe toxicities in a subset of patients, this strategy is only recommended in selected high-risk patients who are carefully followed by an experienced multidisciplinary team.

摘要

在局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA-HNSCC)患者中,在放化疗前使用诱导化疗仍然存在争议。我们探讨了诱导化疗的毒性是否会影响同期放化疗的实施。在 171 例连续的、未经放疗的 HNSCC 患者中,我们确定了 66 例 III-IVB 期头颈部癌患者,他们在计划接受放化疗前接受了诱导化疗。最常见的诱导方案是多西紫杉醇、顺铂和 5-FU(TPF;80%),使用 2-3 个周期。平均放射剂量为 72 Gy(范围,36-75 Gy)。同期化疗方案包括顺铂(26%)、西妥昔单抗(5%)和基于 5-氟尿嘧啶/羟基脲(65%)的方案。中位随访时间为 27 个月(范围,9-56 个月),2 年局部区域控制率和远处控制率分别为 85%和 86%。2 年无病生存率和总生存率分别为 74%和 80%。尽管诱导化疗期间没有 5 级毒性,但 26%的患者因不良事件需要住院治疗,包括 5%的患者需要重症监护。最常见的高等级不良事件是 4 级中性粒细胞减少症(21%)和中性粒细胞减少性发热(17%)。有 6%的患者无法耐受同期化疗。能够按计划完成诱导化疗和同期放化疗的患者 2 年无病生存率显著提高(83% vs. 27%,p<0.001)。在我们的晚期头颈部癌患者队列中,诱导化疗后行同期放化疗可获得有前景的生存率。由于部分患者毒性严重,这种策略仅推荐给经验丰富的多学科团队仔细随访的高危患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验