Suppr超能文献

癌症复发恐惧:自我报告测量的系统文献回顾。

Fear of cancer recurrence: a systematic literature review of self-report measures.

机构信息

Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2012 Jun;21(6):571-87. doi: 10.1002/pon.2070. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior research has shown that many cancer survivors experience ongoing fears of cancer recurrence (FCR) and that this chronic uncertainty of health status during and after cancer treatment can be a significant psychological burden. The field of research on FCR is an emerging area of investigation in the cancer survivorship literature, and several standardised instruments for its assessment have been developed.

AIMS

This review aims to identify all available FCR-specific questionnaires and subscales and critically appraise their properties.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken to identify instruments measuring FCR. Relevant studies were identified via Medline (1950-2010), CINAHL (1982-2010), PsycINFO (1967-2010) and AMED (1985-2010) databases, reference lists of articles and reviews, grey literature databases and consultation with experts in the field. The Medical Outcomes Trust criteria were used to examine the psychometric properties of the questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 20 relevant multi-item measures were identified. The majority of instruments have demonstrated reliability and preliminary evidence of validity. Relatively few brief measures (2-10 items) were found to have comprehensive validation and reliability data available. Several valid and reliable longer measures (>10 items) are available. Three have developed short forms that may prove useful as screening tools.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis indicated that further refinement and validation of existing instruments is required. Valid and reliable instruments are needed for both research and clinical care.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,许多癌症幸存者持续担心癌症复发(FCR),并且在癌症治疗期间和之后,这种对健康状况的慢性不确定性可能会成为一个重大的心理负担。在癌症生存者文献中,对 FCR 的研究是一个新兴的研究领域,已经开发出几种用于评估 FCR 的标准化工具。

目的

本综述旨在确定所有可用的 FCR 特定问卷和子量表,并批判性地评价其特性。

方法

系统地检索了评估 FCR 的工具。通过 Medline(1950-2010 年)、CINAHL(1982-2010 年)、PsycINFO(1967-2010 年)和 AMED(1985-2010 年)数据库、文章和综述的参考文献列表、灰色文献数据库以及与该领域专家的协商,确定了相关研究。使用医疗结果信托标准来检查问卷的心理测量特性。

结果

共确定了 20 种相关的多项目测量方法。大多数仪器都表现出了可靠性和初步的有效性证据。相对较少的简短措施(2-10 项)具有全面的验证和可靠性数据。一些有效的、可靠的长措施(>10 项)是可用的。其中三个已经开发了短表,作为筛查工具可能很有用。

结论

这项分析表明,需要进一步完善和验证现有的工具。研究和临床护理都需要有效和可靠的工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验