Division of Health Policy and Administration, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
BMJ Open. 2011 Jan 1;1(2):e000138. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000138.
Objectives Physician migration from low-income to high-income nations is a global concern. Despite the centrality of understanding the perspectives of international medical graduates (IMGs) who have experienced migration to understanding the causes and consequences of this phenomenon, empirical literature is limited. The authors sought to characterise the experiences of IMGs from limited resource nations currently practicing primary care in the USA, with a focus on their perspectives on physician migration. Design The authors conducted a qualitative study utilising in-depth, in-person interviews and a standardised interview guide. The sample comprised a diverse, purposeful sample of IMGs (n=25) from limited resource nations (defined as having ≤2 physicians per 1000 population). Results Analyses revealed four recurrent and unifying themes reflecting the perspectives of IMGs in the USA on physician migration: (1) decisions to migrate were pragmatic decisions made in the context of individual circumstance; (2) the act of migration ultimately affected participants' ability to return home in multiple, unpredictable ways; (3) the ongoing process of acclimation was coupled with inherent conflicts surrounding the decision to remain in the USA; and (4) the effects of policies in both the home country and in the USA occurred at multiple levels. Conclusion The perspectives of IMGs who have migrated to the USA are an important addition to the ongoing discussion surrounding the global health workforce. Our findings highlight the effects of workforce policies which are often developed and discussed in abstraction, but have real, measurable impacts on the lives of individuals. Future efforts to address physician migration will need to acknowledge the immediate needs of the health workforce as well as the long-term needs of individuals within health systems.
目的
从低收入国家向高收入国家迁移的医生是一个全球性问题。尽管理解经历过迁移的国际医学毕业生(IMG)的观点对于理解这种现象的原因和后果至关重要,但实证文献却很有限。作者试图描述目前在美国从事初级保健工作的来自资源有限国家的 IMG 的经历,重点是他们对医生迁移的看法。
设计
作者进行了一项定性研究,利用深入的面对面访谈和标准化访谈指南。样本包括来自资源有限国家(定义为每 1000 人口有≤2 名医生)的多样化、有目的的 IMG(n=25)的样本。
结果
分析揭示了四个反复出现的统一主题,反映了美国 IMG 对医生迁移的看法:(1)迁移决定是在个人情况背景下做出的务实决定;(2)迁移行为最终以多种不可预测的方式影响参与者回国的能力;(3)持续的适应过程伴随着围绕留在美国的决定的内在冲突;(4)母国和美国的政策的影响发生在多个层面。
结论
向美国迁移的 IMG 的观点是围绕全球卫生人力的持续讨论的重要补充。我们的研究结果强调了劳动力政策的影响,这些政策往往是在抽象的基础上制定和讨论的,但对个人的生活产生了真实的、可衡量的影响。未来解决医生迁移问题的努力需要承认卫生劳动力的当前需求以及卫生系统内个人的长期需求。