Suppr超能文献

眼优势与球镜/散光屈光参差、年龄和性别之间的关系:10264 名近视个体的分析。

Association between ocular dominance and spherical/astigmatic anisometropia, age, and sex: analysis of 10,264 myopic individuals.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Nov 25;52(12):9166-73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8131.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the association between ocular dominance and spherical or astigmatic anisometropia, age, and sex.

METHODS

Medical records of 10,264 myopic refractive surgery candidates were filtered. Ocular dominance was assessed with the hole-in-the-card test. Manifest refractive error was measured in each subject and correlated to ocular dominance. Only subjects with corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of >20/22 in each eye were enrolled, to exclude amblyopia. Associations between ocular dominance and refractive state were analyzed by means of the t-test, χ(2) test, Spearman correlation, and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Right and left eye ocular dominance was noted in 61.7% and 35.6% of the individuals. Ocular dominance had no significant impact on SE refraction in subjects with SE or cylindrical anisometropia <0.5 D. For anisometropia >2.5 D (n = 278) the nondominant eye was more myopic in 63.7% (SE -5.8 ± 2.64 D) compared to 36.3% (-4.69 ± 2.39 D; P < 0.001; adjusted P (Padj) < 0.001) for the dominant eye being more myopic. Nondominant eyes showed higher astigmatic power than dominant eyes (-0.95 ± 0.91 D versus -0.89 ± 0.84 D; P < 0.001). For astigmatic anisometropia >2.5 D, nondominant eyes exhibited a higher amount of astigmatism in 75% of subjects. Nondominant eyes of subjects <29 years and 30 to 39 years of age had a significantly higher astigmatic power than did dominant eyes of the same age group.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to previous reports, this study, including myopic refractive surgery candidates, revealed that the nondominant eye was more myopic for SE anisometropia >2.5 and more astigmatic for cylindrical anisometropia >0.5 D.

摘要

目的

确定眼优势与球镜或散光屈光参差、年龄和性别之间的关系。

方法

筛选了 10264 名近视屈光手术候选者的病历。使用卡片打孔测试评估眼优势。对每位受试者的显性屈光不正进行测量,并与眼优势相关联。仅招募每个眼睛的矫正远视力(CDVA)>20/22 的受试者,以排除弱视。通过 t 检验、χ(2)检验、Spearman 相关和多元逻辑回归分析,分析眼优势与屈光状态之间的关系。

结果

在 61.7%和 35.6%的个体中记录了右眼和左眼的眼优势。在 SE 或圆柱屈光参差<0.5 D 的受试者中,眼优势对 SE 折射无显著影响。对于>2.5 D 的屈光参差(n=278),非优势眼比优势眼更近视,差异有统计学意义(SE-5.8±2.64 D 比 36.3%(SE-4.69±2.39 D;P<0.001;调整后 P 值(Padj)<0.001)。非优势眼的散光力高于优势眼(-0.95±0.91 D 比-0.89±0.84 D;P<0.001)。对于>2.5 D 的散光屈光参差,75%的受试者的非优势眼显示出更高的散光量。年龄<29 岁和 30-39 岁的受试者的非优势眼的散光力明显高于同年龄组的优势眼。

结论

与之前的报告相反,本研究包括近视屈光手术候选者,表明对于 SE 屈光参差>2.5 D,非优势眼更近视,对于圆柱屈光参差>0.5 D,非优势眼更散光。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验