Chen Ying, Ma Huiling, Li Huiyan, Wang Xinyun, Zhang Menghui, Liu Sisi, Wang Xiawei, Cui Hongguang
Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06852-3.
To investigate distribution differences of parafoveal cone photoreceptors between dominant and non-dominant eyes using the adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AO-SLO) system.
This retrospective study included 156 eyes from 78 healthy subjects, all of whom had best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in both eyes and underwent ophthalmological examinations. The dominant eye was determined using the hole-in-the-card test. Retinal cone photoreceptor observations were performed at an eccentricity of 3.0° from the foveal center using the AO-SLO system. Quantitative distribution parameters, including cone density, spacing, regularity, and dispersion of both dominant and non-dominant eyes, were analyzed and compared.
Dominant eyes exhibited higher cone photoreceptors density at a 3.0° horizontal eccentricity from the fovea [22,896 (20,954, 25,179) cells/mm] than non-dominant eyes [22,621 (20,147, 24,253) cells/mm] (p = 0.03). Correspondingly, the spacing of cone photoreceptors in dominant eyes [5.41 (5.09, 5.68) µm] was smaller than that in non-dominant eyes [5.47 (5.23, 5.72) µm] (p = 0.041). The interocular difference in cone regularity between dominant [96.53 (95.07, 97.46)%] and non-dominant [96.68 (95.49, 97.57)%] eyes was statistically significant (p = 0.04). However, there was no significant interocular difference in cone dispersion, which could reflect distribution uniformity (p = 0.795).
Our findings reveal that the dominant eye exhibits higher cone density in the parafoveal region with narrower spacing but a less regular arrangement than the non-dominant eye. These cytological features provide new evidence linking cone photoreceptor distribution to ocular dominance, which may account for the electrophysiological asymmetry observed between the two eyes.
What is known? • The adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope can correct aberrations caused by irregularities in the eye's optics, allowing for the direct and noninvasive observation of retinal microstructures in vivo. What is new? • Our study reveals that parafoveal cone photoreceptors in dominant eyes exhibit significantly higher density, narrower spacing, and a less regular arrangement compared to those in non-dominant eyes in vivo. • The cytological asymmetry between photoreceptor cells in dominant and non-dominant eyes may serve as a potential basis for the electrophysiological differences observed between the two.
使用自适应光学扫描激光检眼镜(AO-SLO)系统研究优势眼和非优势眼之间黄斑旁锥体细胞光感受器的分布差异。
这项回顾性研究纳入了78名健康受试者的156只眼睛,所有受试者双眼最佳矫正视力均为20/20或更好,并接受了眼科检查。使用卡片打孔试验确定优势眼。使用AO-SLO系统在距黄斑中心3.0°的偏心度处进行视网膜锥体细胞光感受器观察。分析并比较优势眼和非优势眼的定量分布参数,包括视锥细胞密度、间距、规则性和离散度。
优势眼在距黄斑中心水平偏心度3.0°处的视锥细胞光感受器密度[22,896(20,954, 25,179)个细胞/mm²]高于非优势眼[22,621(20,147, 24,253)个细胞/mm²](p = 0.03)。相应地,优势眼视锥细胞光感受器的间距[5.41(5.09, 5.68)µm]小于非优势眼[5.47(5.23, 5.72)µm](p = 0.041)。优势眼[96.53(95.07, 97.46)%]和非优势眼[96.68(95.49, 97.57)%]之间视锥细胞规则性的眼间差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。然而,视锥细胞离散度的眼间差异无统计学意义,离散度可反映分布均匀性(p = 0.795)。
我们的研究结果表明,优势眼在黄斑旁区域表现出更高的视锥细胞密度,间距更窄,但排列不如非优势眼规则。这些细胞学特征为视锥细胞光感受器分布与眼优势之间的联系提供了新证据,这可能解释了两眼之间观察到的电生理不对称性。
已知的是什么?• 自适应光学扫描激光检眼镜可以校正由眼睛光学不规则引起的像差,从而在体内直接和无创地观察视网膜微观结构。新发现是什么?• 我们的研究表明,与体内非优势眼相比,优势眼的黄斑旁视锥细胞光感受器密度显著更高、间距更窄且排列更不规则。• 优势眼和非优势眼光感受器细胞之间的细胞学不对称可能是两眼之间观察到的电生理差异的潜在基础。