Chokkalingam M, Kandaswamy D
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, VMS Dental College, Salem, India.
J Conserv Dent. 2011 Jul;14(3):273-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.85815.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of three obturation techniques namely lateral condensation, EQ Fil (backfill obturation) and thermafil (core carrier obturation) techniques using three-dimensional (3D) helical computed tomography (CT) by volume rendering method.
Thirty freshly extracted teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 10 teeth each. Biomechanical preparation was done in all the teeth using rotary instruments. All three sets of teeth were placed in helical CT slice scanner and were imaged before obturation. The three sets were then obturated by following methods: Group I: lateral condensation, Group II: EQ Fil (backfill) and Group III: thermafil (core carrier obturation).Volume of the pulp chamber and gutta-percha after obturation were calculated using volume rendering technique and adequacy of the obturation techniques were calculated.
One-way ANOVA and Multiple-Range Tukey Test by Tukey-HSD procedure
Mean change in lateral condensation (0.005±0.002) was significantly higher than that of thermafil obturation (0.002±0.001) [P<0.05].
Conventional lateral condensation technique showed maximal inadequacy of obturation and thermafil obturation technique showed the least inadequacy of obturation when the volume of the specimens were calculated and reconstructed.
本研究旨在通过容积再现法,利用三维(3D)螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)评估三种根管充填技术,即侧向加压充填、EQ Fil(回充充填)和热牙胶尖(核心载体充填)技术的充填效果。
将30颗新鲜拔除的牙齿随机分为三组,每组10颗。所有牙齿均使用旋转器械进行生物力学预备。将所有三组牙齿置于螺旋CT切片扫描仪中,在充填前进行成像。然后,三组牙齿分别采用以下方法进行充填:第一组:侧向加压充填;第二组:EQ Fil(回充);第三组:热牙胶尖(核心载体充填)。使用容积再现技术计算充填后髓腔和牙胶的体积,并计算充填技术的充填效果。
采用单向方差分析和Tukey-HSD程序的多重极差Tukey检验
侧向加压充填的平均变化量(0.005±0.002)显著高于热牙胶尖充填(0.002±0.001)[P<0.05]。
当计算和重建标本体积时,传统的侧向加压充填技术显示出最大的充填不足,而热牙胶尖充填技术显示出最小的充填不足。