• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窝洞预处理程序对牙本质粘结的影响:一项四年期临床评估。

The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: a four-year clinical evaluation.

作者信息

van Dijken J W

机构信息

Department of Odontology, Umeå University, Faculty of Odontology, Sweden.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Aug;64(2):148-52. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90169-d.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(90)90169-d
PMID:2202813
Abstract

Cervical abrasion and erosion lesions were restored with composite resin restorations bonded with four different dentin-bonding resins, an enamel-bonding resin, or restorations of a glass ionomer cement. The long-term clinical retention of the restorations were evaluated during a 4-year period. The surrounding enamel was not acid-etched. Four cleaning methods for dentin pretreatment were used to study their effects on the bonding between dentin and the restorative materials. The dentin was treated with either (1) etching for 60 seconds or (2) 15 seconds with 37% phosphoric acid, (3) cleaning with 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCL) for 20 seconds, or (4) cleaning with Tubulicid etchant for 60 seconds. None of the composite resin restorations, regardless of pretreatment or bonding method, showed acceptable restorations. All glass ionomer cement restorations were retained after pretreatment with Tubulicid etchant and 5% NaOCL after a 6-month period. Full acceptance, in other words, 3 year retention, was reached only after pretreatment with NaOCL.

摘要

使用四种不同的牙本质粘结树脂、一种釉质粘结树脂或玻璃离子粘固剂修复体对宫颈磨损和糜烂病变进行复合树脂修复。在4年期间评估修复体的长期临床保留情况。修复体周围的釉质未进行酸蚀处理。使用四种牙本质预处理清洁方法研究它们对牙本质与修复材料之间粘结的影响。牙本质分别采用以下方法处理:(1)用37%磷酸酸蚀60秒;(2)用37%磷酸酸蚀15秒;(3)用5%次氯酸钠(NaOCL)清洗20秒;(4)用Tubulicid蚀刻剂清洗60秒。无论预处理或粘结方法如何,所有复合树脂修复体均未显示出可接受的修复效果。在使用Tubulicid蚀刻剂和5% NaOCL预处理6个月后,所有玻璃离子粘固剂修复体均得以保留。只有在使用NaOCL预处理后,修复体才能完全被接受,即保留3年。

相似文献

1
The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: a four-year clinical evaluation.窝洞预处理程序对牙本质粘结的影响:一项四年期临床评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Aug;64(2):148-52. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90169-d.
2
Three-year evaluation of effect of surface conditioning on bonding of glass ionomer cement in cervical abrasion lesions.表面预处理对玻璃离子水门汀粘结于颈部磨损病变效果的三年评估
Scand J Dent Res. 1992 Apr;100(2):133-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01726.x.
3
Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.与宫颈磨损/糜烂修复临床成功相关的因素。
Oper Dent. 1995 Jan-Feb;20(1):7-13.
4
Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.V类树脂复合材料与玻璃离子修复体的临床比较
Am J Dent. 1992 Oct;5(5):249-52.
5
Four-year evaluation of the effect of 10% polyacrylic acid or water rinsing pretreatment on retention of glass polyalkenoate cement.
Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Feb;104(1):64-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00047.x.
6
Five-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent.
Scand J Dent Res. 1992 Aug;100(4):244-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01751.x.
7
Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1990 Dec;121(6):694-6. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0269.
8
Clinical evaluation of the bond between composite resin and etched glass ionomer cement.
Aust Dent J. 1989 Feb;34(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1989.tb02997.x.
9
Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.V类树脂改性玻璃离子和树脂复合体修复体的两年临床性能
Oper Dent. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):477-81.
10
Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.玻璃离子水门汀和复合树脂修复体在切割的无固位形预备体及已存在的颈部侵蚀/磨损病变中的微渗漏
J Tenn Dent Assoc. 1993 Apr;73(2):24-8.