Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neurosciences University of Palermo, Via G. La Loggia, 1; 90100 Palermo, Italy.
Brain Stimul. 2011 Oct;4(4):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over right posterior parietal cortex was shown to induce interference on visuospatial perception in healthy subjects. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is another noninvasive brain stimulation technique that works modulating cortical activity. It is applied through easy to use, noncostly, and portable devices.
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the current study was to investigate if the novel approach of "dual" stimulation over parietal cortices compared with the unilateral (right) cathodal one is able to induce greater and/or longer-lasting neglect-like effects in normal subjects performing a computerized visuospatial task.
Eleven healthy subjects underwent a computerized visuospatial task requiring judgments about the symmetry of prebisected lines in baseline condition, during and after tDCS. Right cathodal and left anodal tDCS were simultaneously applied over homologue posterior parietal cortices in the "dual" approach, whereas right cathodal tDCS was used in the traditional unihemisphere stimulation.
A significant rightward bias in symmetry judgments as compared with baseline and sham conditions was observed in both the stimulation approaches. With "dual" tDCS compared with cathodal stimulation the effect was stronger and appeared earlier, but no longer-lasting after effects were found.
We speculate that the resulting modulation of interhemispheric inhibition mediated the additional rightward bias in task performance for "dual" hemisphere compared with unihemisphere tDCS. If "dual" tDCS may better reproduce mechanisms underlying real lesions, it could provide a more suitable model for rehabilitation of negligent patients.
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作用于右顶后皮质可引起健康受试者的视空间感知干扰。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是另一种非侵入性脑刺激技术,通过调节皮质活动起作用。它可以通过易于使用、成本低廉且便携的设备来应用。
目的/假设:本研究的目的是探讨与单侧(右侧)阴极刺激相比,“双”刺激顶叶皮质是否能在执行计算机化视空间任务的正常受试者中引起更大和/或更持久的类似忽视的效应。
11 名健康受试者在基线状态、tDCS 期间和之后进行了一项计算机化视空间任务,要求判断预分割线的对称性。在“双”方法中,同时在同源顶后皮质上施加右阴极和左阳极 tDCS,而在传统的单侧刺激中使用右阴极 tDCS。
与基线和假刺激条件相比,两种刺激方法均观察到对称性判断的明显右偏。与阴极刺激相比,“双”tDCS 的效果更强,出现更早,但没有发现更长时间的后效。
我们推测,这种对半球间抑制的调节导致了“双”半球 tDCS 相对于单侧 tDCS 任务表现出更强的右偏。如果“双”tDCS 可以更好地模拟真实病变的机制,那么它可以为忽视患者的康复提供一个更合适的模型。