Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析:快速诊断测试与胎盘组织学、显微镜检查和 PCR 检测孕妇疟疾的比较。

Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women.

机构信息

Royal Tropical Institute/Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen (KIT), KIT Biomedical Research, Parasitology Unit, AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Malar J. 2011 Oct 28;10:321. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-321.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During pregnancy, malaria infection with Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax is related to adverse maternal health and poor birth outcomes. Diagnosis of malaria, during pregnancy, is complicated by the absence or low parasite densities in peripheral blood. Diagnostic methods, other than microscopy, are needed for detection of placental malaria. Therefore, the diagnostic accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), detecting antigen, and molecular techniques (PCR), detecting DNA, for the diagnosis of Plasmodium infections in pregnancy was systematically reviewed.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of RDTs, PCR, microscopy of peripheral and placental blood and placental histology for the detection of malaria infection (all species) in pregnant women.

RESULTS

The results of 49 studies were analysed in metandi (Stata), of which the majority described P. falciparum infections. Although both placental and peripheral blood microscopy cannot reliably replace histology as a reference standard for placental P. falciparum infection, many studies compared RDTs and PCR to these tests. The proportion of microscopy positives in placental blood (sensitivity) detected by peripheral blood microscopy, RDTs and PCR are respectively 72% [95% CI 62-80], 81% [95% CI 55-93] and 94% [95% CI 86-98]. The proportion of placental blood microscopy negative women that were negative in peripheral blood microscopy, RDTs and PCR (specificity) are 98% [95% CI 95-99], 94% [95% CI 76-99] and 77% [95% CI 71-82]. Based on the current data, it was not possible to determine if the false positives in RDTs and PCR are caused by sequestered parasites in the placenta that are not detected by placental microscopy.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that RDTs and PCR may have good performance characteristics to serve as alternatives for the diagnosis of malaria in pregnancy, besides any other limitations and practical considerations concerning the use of these tests. Nevertheless, more studies with placental histology as reference test are urgently required to reliably determine the accuracy of RDTs and PCR for the diagnosis of placental malaria. P. vivax-infections have been neglected in diagnostic test accuracy studies of malaria in pregnancy.

摘要

背景

在妊娠期间,感染疟原虫(恶性疟原虫或间日疟原虫)会对产妇健康和分娩结局产生不良影响。外周血中寄生虫密度低或不存在时,会使妊娠期间疟疾的诊断变得复杂。因此,需要其他诊断方法(除了显微镜检查之外)来检测胎盘疟疾。因此,系统评价了用于诊断妊娠期间疟原虫感染的快速诊断检测(RDT)、检测 DNA 的分子技术(PCR)和检测抗原的检测方法的诊断准确性。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Web of Science,以评估用于检测孕妇疟疾感染(所有物种)的 RDT、PCR、外周血和胎盘血镜检和胎盘组织病理学的诊断准确性的研究。

结果

对 49 项研究的结果进行了 metandi(Stata)分析,其中大多数研究描述了恶性疟原虫感染。尽管外周血镜检和胎盘血镜检均不能可靠地替代胎盘组织病理学作为胎盘恶性疟原虫感染的参考标准,但许多研究将 RDT 和 PCR 与这些检测方法进行了比较。外周血镜检阳性(敏感性)的胎盘血比例,通过外周血镜检、RDT 和 PCR 检测分别为 72%[95%CI 62-80]、81%[95%CI 55-93]和 94%[95%CI 86-98]。在外周血镜检阴性的女性中,胎盘血镜检、RDT 和 PCR 阴性的比例分别为 98%[95%CI 95-99]、94%[95%CI 76-99]和 77%[95%CI 71-82]。根据目前的数据,无法确定 RDT 和 PCR 中的假阳性是否是由胎盘内未被胎盘镜检检测到的被隔离的寄生虫引起的。

结论

研究结果表明,RDT 和 PCR 可能具有良好的性能特征,可以作为妊娠期间疟疾诊断的替代方法,但考虑到这些检测方法的任何其他局限性和实际使用问题,还需要更多具有胎盘组织病理学作为参考测试的研究来可靠地确定 RDT 和 PCR 诊断胎盘疟疾的准确性。妊娠期间疟疾诊断检测准确性研究中忽视了间日疟原虫感染。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a38a/3228868/2cb0703e8703/1475-2875-10-321-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验