Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Jul;19(4):492-500. doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0462-x.
Although C-reactive protein (CRP) can be measured by a standard blood test, its diagnostic value for distinguishing patients with inflammatory complications after pancreatic surgery from patients with normal postoperative inflammatory responses has not been adequately investigated. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CRP levels for the occurrence of postoperative inflammatory complications after pancreatic surgery.
Clinical data and CRP levels measured in 280 patients after pancreatic surgeries (performed between 1998 and 2010) until postoperative day 10 (POD 10) were retrospectively analyzed. Using the receiver operating characteristic method, diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by an area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Furthermore, the results of the present study were compared to previously published reports by applying diagnostic meta-analysis techniques.
The 30-day mortality rate was 3.9% (95% CI 2.1-7.0%). Inflammatory complications occurred in 153 of 280 patients (54.6%; 95% CI 48.8-60.4%). On POD 4, the AUC was 0.67 (95% CI 0.58-0.76). The highest diagnostic accuracy was observed on POD 7 (AUC 0.77; 95% CI 0.68-0.85). In a diagnostic meta-analysis that included two additional studies, the diagnostic sensitivity on POD 4 was 0.63 (95% CI 0.50-0.76), and the specificity was 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.88). The highest sensitivity occurred on POD 6 (0.75; 95% CI 0.68-0.82). Considerable statistical heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of PODs 3, 4 and 5.
According to this limited evidence, CRP levels had a low to moderate diagnostic accuracy. Large, blinded studies are warranted for a more precise estimation of CRP's diagnostic value.
尽管 C 反应蛋白(CRP)可以通过标准血液检测进行测量,但尚未充分研究其用于区分胰腺手术后发生炎症并发症的患者与术后炎症反应正常的患者的诊断价值。本研究旨在评估 CRP 水平对胰腺手术后发生术后炎症并发症的发生的诊断准确性。
回顾性分析了 1998 年至 2010 年间进行的 280 例胰腺手术后患者(术后第 10 天(POD 10))的临床数据和 CRP 水平。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线方法,通过曲线下面积(AUC)分析评估诊断准确性。此外,通过应用诊断荟萃分析技术,将本研究的结果与以前发表的报告进行了比较。
30 天死亡率为 3.9%(95%CI 2.1-7.0%)。280 例患者中有 153 例(54.6%;95%CI 48.8-60.4%)发生炎症并发症。在 POD 4 时,AUC 为 0.67(95%CI 0.58-0.76)。在 POD 7 时,诊断准确性最高(AUC 0.77;95%CI 0.68-0.85)。在包含另外两项研究的诊断荟萃分析中,POD 4 的诊断敏感度为 0.63(95%CI 0.50-0.76),特异性为 0.79(95%CI 0.71-0.88)。在 POD 6 时,敏感性最高(0.75;95%CI 0.68-0.82)。在 POD 3、4 和 5 的分析中观察到相当大的统计异质性。
根据这有限的证据,CRP 水平具有低到中等的诊断准确性。需要进行大型、盲法研究,以更准确地估计 CRP 的诊断价值。