Carlson Gabrielle A, Blader Joseph C
Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Putnam Hall-South Campus, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8790, USA.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;21(5):399-405. doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0007.
This study examines diagnoses that occur in an outpatient sample when both parent and teacher endorse significant manic symptoms and when only a parent observes them. We hypothesized that the diagnosis of mania/bipolar (BP) disorder would occur when there is parent/teacher concordance on high mania symptom scores.
Subjects were 911 5-18-year-old psychiatrically diagnosed youths with caregiver and teacher completed Child Mania Rating Scales (CMRSs) and Achenbach parent and teacher forms. Parent-teacher concordance on the CMRS was defined as both informants ≥75 percentile on the CMRS; discordance on the CMRS was defined as parent ≥75 percentile and teacher ≤25 percentile. Logistic regression examined factors associated with a child's parent and teacher ratings concordant for high CMRS total scores.
Correlation between parent CMRS (CMRS-P) and teacher CMRS (CMRS-T) scores was r=0.27 (p<0.000). Correlation between the CMRS-P and the Child Behavior Checklist "bipolar/dysregulation" phenotype was r=0.757 and between the CMRS-T and Teacher Report Form "bipolar/dysregulation" phenotype was r=0.786. A total of 66 (7.3%) of the 911 children were diagnosed with BP I (n=20) or II (n=3) or BP disorder not otherwise specified (BPNOS, n=43). If the CMRS-P score was ≥15, 14.7% (vs. 4.4%) had any BP (odds ratio: 3.6; 95% confidence interval: 2.1, 6.2). Teacher agreement or disagreement did not add to diagnostic accuracy for students with BP I or II. BPNOS was more common in children with concordant high CMRS-P and CMRS-T ratings (10.5% vs. 4.8%) but the difference was not statistically significant. However, logistic regression indicated 10-fold greater odds of both parents and teachers, providing high CMRS ratings among children who were diagnosed with externalizing disorders (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, or any combination of these). Children with internalizing disorders (anxiety and depressive disorders) were 3.7 times more likely to have discordant CMRS-P/CMRS-T ratings.
Parent and teacher concordance on high mania rating scale scores was most associated with externalizing disorders, and discordance was most associated with internalizing disorders.
本研究调查了在门诊样本中,当父母和教师均认可显著的躁狂症状以及只有父母观察到这些症状时所做出的诊断。我们假设,当父母/教师在高躁狂症状评分上达成一致时,会做出躁狂/双相(BP)障碍的诊断。
研究对象为911名5至18岁经精神科诊断的青少年,其照料者和教师完成了儿童躁狂评定量表(CMRS)以及阿肯巴克儿童行为量表父母版和教师版。CMRS上的父母-教师一致性被定义为两位报告者的CMRS得分均处于第75百分位数及以上;CMRS上的不一致被定义为父母得分处于第75百分位数及以上而教师得分处于第25百分位数及以下。逻辑回归分析了与儿童父母和教师在高CMRS总分上评分一致相关的因素。
父母CMRS(CMRS-P)得分与教师CMRS(CMRS-T)得分之间的相关性为r = 0.27(p < 0.000)。CMRS-P与儿童行为清单“双相/失调”表型之间的相关性为r = 0.757,CMRS-T与教师报告表“双相/失调”表型之间的相关性为r = 0.786。911名儿童中共有66名(7.3%)被诊断为I型双相障碍(n = 20)或II型双相障碍(n = 3)或未特定指明的双相障碍(BPNOS,n = 43)。如果CMRS-P得分≥15,14.7%(相比4.4%)的儿童患有任何双相障碍(比值比:3.6;95%置信区间:2.1,6.2)。对于I型或II型双相障碍的学生,教师的认可或不认可并未增加诊断准确性。BPNOS在CMRS-P和CMRS-T评分均高且一致的儿童中更为常见(10.5% 对4.8%),但差异无统计学意义。然而,逻辑回归表明,在被诊断为外化性障碍(注意力缺陷/多动障碍、对立违抗障碍、品行障碍或这些障碍的任何组合)的儿童中,父母和教师给出高CMRS评分的可能性要高10倍。患有内化性障碍(焦虑和抑郁障碍)的儿童CMRS-P/CMRS-T评分不一致的可能性要高3.7倍。
父母和教师在高躁狂评定量表得分上的一致性与外化性障碍最为相关,而不一致则与内化性障碍最为相关。