Freeman Andrew J, Youngstrom Eric A, Freeman Megan J, Youngstrom Jennifer Kogos, Findling Robert L
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;21(5):425-32. doi: 10.1089/cap.2011.0033.
Cross-informant disagreement is common and results in different interpretations of a youth's behavior. Theoretical explanations for discrepancies typically rely on scale level analyses. This article explores whether caregivers and adolescents differ in when they notice and report symptoms of youth mania depending on the severity of overall manic disturbance.
Participants were 459 adolescent-caregiver pairs recruited at either a community mental health center or an academic medical center. Adolescents were most likely to have a primary diagnosis of unipolar depression (37%) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder/disruptive behavior disorder (36%). Nineteen percent of adolescents received a bipolar spectrum disorder diagnosis (4% bipolar I and 15% bipolar II, cyclothymia, or bipolar not otherwise specificed). Caregivers were primarily biological mothers (74%) or grandparents (8%). Adolescents and caregivers independently completed the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) about the adolescent.
Item response theory analyses of the entire sample indicated that in general, both caregivers and adolescents reserved endorsement of mania symptoms for the most severely ill half of participants. Comparisons of caregiver and adolescent report of symptoms on the MDQ indicated two significant differences. Caregivers were more likely to report irritability at significantly lower severity of mania than adolescents. Adolescents endorsed only increased energy or hyperactivity at lower severities than caregivers.
Adolescents and caregivers will have different concerns and might report different symptoms consistent with whom the symptom impacts first. Caregivers are more likely to report behaviors such as irritability, whereas adolescents are more likely to report subjective feelings such as feeling more energetic or more hyperactive.
不同信息提供者之间的意见分歧很常见,这会导致对青少年行为的不同解读。对差异的理论解释通常依赖于量表层面的分析。本文探讨了照顾者和青少年在注意到并报告青少年躁狂症状时是否会因总体躁狂障碍的严重程度而有所不同。
研究对象为459对青少年-照顾者,他们是在社区心理健康中心或学术医疗中心招募的。青少年最常见的初步诊断为单相抑郁症(37%)或注意力缺陷多动障碍/破坏性行为障碍(36%)。19%的青少年被诊断为双相谱系障碍(4%为双相I型,15%为双相II型、环性心境障碍或未特定的双相障碍)。照顾者主要是亲生母亲(74%)或祖父母(8%)。青少年和照顾者分别独立完成了关于该青少年的心境障碍问卷(MDQ)。
对整个样本的项目反应理论分析表明,总体而言,照顾者和青少年都倾向于对病情最严重的一半参与者认可其躁狂症状。对照顾者和青少年在MDQ上症状报告的比较显示出两个显著差异。在躁狂严重程度明显较低时,照顾者比青少年更有可能报告易怒情绪。在较低严重程度时,青少年认可的只是精力增加或多动,而照顾者认可的症状更多。
青少年和照顾者会有不同的关注点,可能会报告与症状首先影响的对象相符的不同症状。照顾者更有可能报告易怒等行为,而青少年更有可能报告精力更充沛或多动等主观感受。