Suppr超能文献

医院工作人员的机会性结肠镜筛查:参与情况、不适程度和重复该程序的意愿。

Opportunistic screening of hospital staff using primary colonoscopy: participation, discomfort and willingness to repeat the procedure.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Digestion. 2011;84(4):281-8. doi: 10.1159/000327383. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participation in and tolerability of primary colonoscopy screening are presumed to be relatively low. The present study aimed to test its feasibility in a well-informed population of hospital staff using an intensive information campaign, and to identify factors associated with screening colonoscopy rated as uncomfortable.

METHODS

Data were collected using standardized forms.

RESULTS

Out of 1,090 invited employees (50-65 years), 447 (41.0%) participated. Bowel preparation and colonoscopy were rated as 'somewhat to very uncomfortable' by 79.5 and 21.9%, respectively. 96.3% of participants were willing to repeat colonoscopy in the future. Participants rating colonoscopy as uncomfortable were more likely unwilling to repeat the procedure (OR 8.026, CI 2.667-24.154). Multivariate analysis (age- and gender-adjusted) showed an association of colonoscopy rated as uncomfortable with: abdominal pain during colonoscopy (OR 3.185, CI 1.642-6.178), other pain (OR 2.428, CI 1.335-4.416), flatulence (OR 2.175, CI 1.219-3.881), embarrassment (OR 2.843, CI 1.350-5.989), abdominal pain after colonoscopy (OR 1.976, CI 1.041-3.751), and a prolonged procedure time (OR 1.000, CI 1.000-1.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptance of primary colonoscopy screening for colorectal neoplasia was high, although participants with symptoms during and after colonoscopy were more likely to rate colonoscopy as uncomfortable. This type of opportunistic screening procedure is suitable for the introduction of screening programs and may be useful in areas that have no access to population-based screening.

摘要

背景

初步结肠镜筛查的参与度和耐受性被认为相对较低。本研究旨在通过强化信息宣传活动,在知情的医院员工人群中检验其可行性,并确定与被评为不舒服的结肠镜筛查相关的因素。

方法

使用标准化表格收集数据。

结果

在受邀的 1090 名员工(50-65 岁)中,有 447 名(41.0%)参与。肠道准备和结肠镜检查分别被评为“有些不舒服到非常不舒服”的比例为 79.5%和 21.9%。96.3%的参与者愿意将来再次进行结肠镜检查。将结肠镜检查评为不舒服的参与者更不愿意重复该程序(OR 8.026,95%CI 2.667-24.154)。多变量分析(年龄和性别调整)显示,将结肠镜检查评为不舒服与以下因素相关:结肠镜检查期间腹痛(OR 3.185,95%CI 1.642-6.178)、其他疼痛(OR 2.428,95%CI 1.335-4.416)、腹胀(OR 2.175,95%CI 1.219-3.881)、尴尬(OR 2.843,95%CI 1.350-5.989)、结肠镜检查后腹痛(OR 1.976,95%CI 1.041-3.751)和程序时间延长(OR 1.000,95%CI 1.000-1.001)。

结论

尽管结肠镜检查期间和之后有症状的参与者更有可能将结肠镜检查评为不舒服,但接受结直肠肿瘤初步结肠镜筛查的意愿仍然很高。这种机会性筛查程序适合引入筛查计划,并且可能对无法进行基于人群的筛查的地区有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验