Aminian Gholamreza, O'Toole John Mitchell
University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011 Dec;35(4):445-50. doi: 10.1177/0309364611425094. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
Prosthetics and orthotics is a relatively recent addition to the suite of undergraduate professional preparation programmes. There has been limited publication regarding international patterns of curriculum development, particularly concerning how objectives differ across global regions.
This paper compares current prosthetics and orthotics curricula from a range of regions and identifies both common and distinctive objectives.
Mixed method: document analysis followed by modified Delphi process.
Documents were analysed qualitatively to compare various curricula and emergent features were evaluated by a group of expert prosthetics and orthotics instructors.
There was substantial agreement that programmes should improve student knowledge and understanding. They should establish and extend student fabrication, communication skills and professional co-operation. However, there appeared to be regional differences in the priority given to critical thinking and clinical reasoning; integration of theory and practice and particular approaches to teaching prosthetics and orthotics.
This study revealed substantial consensus regarding the importance of clear programme objectives dealing with student abilities, professional skills and contemporary understanding. However, this study also revealed regional differences that may well reward further investigation.
假肢与矫形器专业是本科专业培养计划中相对较新的专业。关于课程发展的国际模式,尤其是全球不同地区目标差异的相关出版物较少。
本文比较了不同地区当前的假肢与矫形器课程,并确定了共同目标和独特目标。
混合方法:文献分析后进行改进的德尔菲法。
对文献进行定性分析以比较各种课程,并由一组假肢与矫形器专家教师评估所出现的特征。
大家基本一致认为,课程应提高学生的知识和理解能力。应培养并提升学生的制作、沟通技能以及专业合作能力。然而,在批判性思维和临床推理的优先级、理论与实践的整合以及假肢与矫形器教学的特定方法上,似乎存在地区差异。
本研究揭示了在明确涉及学生能力、专业技能和当代理解的课程目标的重要性方面存在大量共识。然而,本研究也揭示了可能值得进一步研究的地区差异。