Ankara Hernia Center, Ankara, Turkey.
Hernia. 2012 Apr;16(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0888-8. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
Umbilical hernia is a common surgical problem. However, there seems to be a certain discrepancy between its importance and the attention it has received in the literature to date. This prospective study aimed to report a detailed analysis of prosthetic umbilical hernia repairs with local anesthesia in a day-case setting.
It was planned to enroll 100 consecutive patients who underwent an elective umbilical hernia repair with local anesthesia. Patients who required general anesthesia and simultaneous hernia repairs were excluded. The procedure including local anesthesia and intravenous sedation was explained to the patients in detail by the operating surgeons and the anesthesiologist. The following parameters were strictly recorded: gender, age, body mass index (BMI), concomitant diseases, history of hernia (primary/recurrent), size of fascial defect, duration of operation, level of intravenous sedation (light/moderate), discharge time, and complications.
There were 54 male and 46 female patients. The mean age was 48.6 years (24-78 years). Four patients were older than 70 years of age. Forty-one patients had 84 concomitant diseases. Eleven patients had a recurrent hernia. Female patients more frequently presented with a recurrent hernia than male patients (19.6 vs. 3.7%, P = 0.009). A standard polypropylene mesh was used in the onlay position in 91 cases. In nine cases, a light mesh was placed in the preperitoneal space. A closed vacuum drain was left in situ in 37 cases. Light sedation was set in 86 cases, whereas 12 patients received a moderate sedation. Monitored anesthesia care was used in two cases. When moderate sedation was needed, a concurrent increase in lidocaine dose and total volume was recorded. There was a positive correlation between increased lidocaine use and high midazolam dose and additional propofol requirement. The mean total local anesthetic volume was 33 ml (10-63 ml). Lidocaine doses displayed a large range between the cases (70-600 mg). The mean lidocaine dose was 263.3 mg (standard deviation [SD]: 103.4). No bupivacaine was given in 19 cases, whereas the mean bupivacaine dose was 35.1 mg (0-100 mg) in 81 cases. The mean duration in the operation room was 69 min (25-150 min). It was significantly longer for recurrent hernias than primary ones (95 vs. 65 min; P = 0.0001). Higher total volume and higher lidocaine doses were required for the repair of recurrent hernias. In addition, it was observed that the longer the operation time, then the longer the lidocaine dose and the higher the total volume of local anesthetic agents. The patient satisfaction rate was 97%. The mean discharge time was 122 ± 58 min (45-420 min). Sixty-seven patients were sent home within 2 h. Early wound problems were observed in 11 patients. Small seromas and hematomas developed in six cases, and dissolved without drainage. Three superficial surgical site infections diagnosed by erythema and enduration were recorded without obvious suppuration. No recurrence was recorded after a mean follow-up of 17 months (5-41 months). One patient complained of pain at the lower edge of a standard polypropylene mesh at the third postoperative month.
The repair of umbilical hernias with local anesthesia in a day-case setting is a good option, with low infection and recurrence rates. Most patients can be discharged early as planned. Separate doses and total volume of local anesthetic agents needed for umbilical hernia repair are clearly higher than those used in inguinal hernia repair. Patients with higher BMI, recurrent hernia, and defects larger than 3 cm may require higher local analgesic doses. The patient satisfaction is very good when the patients are provided with detailed information about day-surgery and local anesthesia.
脐疝是一种常见的外科问题。然而,它的重要性似乎与其在文献中受到的关注程度之间存在一定的差异。本前瞻性研究旨在报告在日间手术环境下使用局部麻醉进行补片脐疝修复的详细分析。
计划纳入 100 例连续接受择期脐疝修补术并接受局部麻醉的患者。排除需要全身麻醉和同时进行疝修补的患者。手术医生和麻醉师详细向患者解释包括局部麻醉和静脉镇静在内的程序。严格记录以下参数:性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、合并症、疝病史(原发性/复发性)、筋膜缺损大小、手术时间、静脉镇静水平(轻度/中度)、出院时间和并发症。
共有 54 名男性和 46 名女性患者。平均年龄为 48.6 岁(24-78 岁)。4 名患者年龄大于 70 岁。41 名患者有 84 种合并症。11 名患者有复发性疝。女性患者比男性患者更常出现复发性疝(19.6%对 3.7%,P = 0.009)。91 例患者使用标准聚丙烯补片置于覆盖位,9 例患者在腹膜前间隙放置轻度补片,37 例患者留置闭式真空引流管。86 例患者给予轻度镇静,12 例患者给予中度镇静。2 例患者使用监测麻醉护理。当需要中度镇静时,记录到利多卡因剂量和总量增加。利多卡因用量增加与咪达唑仑高剂量和需要额外使用丙泊酚呈正相关。总局部麻醉剂体积平均为 33 毫升(10-63 毫升)。利多卡因剂量在各病例之间差异很大(70-600 毫克)。平均利多卡因剂量为 263.3 毫克(标准差 [SD]:103.4)。19 例未使用布比卡因,81 例患者的平均布比卡因剂量为 35.1 毫克(0-100 毫克)。手术室的平均手术时间为 69 分钟(25-150 分钟)。复发性疝的手术时间明显长于原发性疝(95 对 65 分钟;P = 0.0001)。修复复发性疝需要更大的总容量和更高的利多卡因剂量。此外,观察到手术时间越长,利多卡因剂量越高,局部麻醉剂总容量越大。患者满意度为 97%。平均出院时间为 122 ± 58 分钟(45-420 分钟)。67 名患者在 2 小时内出院。11 名患者出现早期伤口问题。6 例出现小的血清肿和血肿,无需引流即可溶解。3 例浅表手术部位感染被诊断为红斑和硬结,无明显化脓。平均随访 17 个月(5-41 个月)后无复发。1 名患者在术后第 3 个月抱怨标准聚丙烯补片下缘疼痛。
在日间手术环境下使用局部麻醉修复脐疝是一种很好的选择,感染和复发率低。大多数患者可以按计划尽早出院。脐疝修复所需的局部麻醉剂单独剂量和总容量明显高于腹股沟疝修复。BMI 较高、复发性疝和缺损大于 3 厘米的患者可能需要更高的局部镇痛剂量。当患者详细了解日间手术和局部麻醉时,患者满意度非常好。