University Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.
Int J Psychol. 2011 Apr 1;46(2):119-26. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2010.519770.
Early findings from Broca and Wernicke led to the classical view of hemispheric specialization, where the main idea relates to left-hemisphere language capabilities compared to right-hemisphere visual capabilities. Federmeier and Benjamin (2005) have suggested that semantic encoding for verbal information in the right hemisphere can be more effective when memory demands are higher. In light of this, our main goal was to study the effect of retention level of verbal information on hemispheric processes. However, regarding the cross-linguistic differences in orthography and their subsequent effects on word recognition (Frost, Katz, & Bentin, 1987), our intent was also to test prior predictions of Federmeier and Benjamin (2005) for a "shallow" orthography language, where words have a clear correspondence between graphemes and phonemes, as opposed to English, which is a "deep" orthography language. Portuguese concrete nouns were selected. The participants were submitted to a visual half-field word presentation using a continuous recognition memory paradigm. The retention level included 1, 2, 4, 8, 20 or 40 words. Results showed that recognition accuracy was higher for words studied in the right visual field, compared to those studied in the left visual field, when the retention interval included 2, 4, or 20 words. No significant differences were found for the remaining intervals. Further analysis on accuracy data for intermediate retention levels showed that recognition accuracy was higher for the 2 words retention level than for the levels including 4, 8, or 20 words; it was higher for left-hemisphere encoding as well. Our results also indicated that reaction times were slower for left-hemisphere encoding and for the 40 words retention level when compared to that of 20 words. In summary, the current results are in partial agreement with those of Federmeier and Benjamin (2005) and suggest different hemispheric memory strategies for the semantic encoding of verbal information.
早期的布洛卡和韦尼克的研究结果导致了半球专门化的经典观点,主要涉及左半球的语言能力与右半球的视觉能力相比。费德米尔和本杰明(2005 年)提出,在记忆需求较高时,右半球对言语信息的语义编码可能更有效。鉴于此,我们的主要目标是研究言语信息的保留水平对半球过程的影响。然而,鉴于拼写法的跨语言差异及其对单词识别的后续影响(弗罗斯特、卡茨和本廷,1987 年),我们也意图测试费德米尔和本杰明(2005 年)的先前预测,即对于具有清晰的字形和音位对应关系的“浅”拼写法语言,如葡萄牙语,而英语则是一种“深”拼写法语言。选择了葡萄牙语具体名词。参与者接受了使用连续识别记忆范式的视觉半视野单词呈现。保留水平包括 1、2、4、8、20 或 40 个单词。结果表明,当保留间隔包括 2、4 或 20 个单词时,与左视野相比,右视野学习的单词的识别准确性更高。对于其余的间隔,没有发现显著差异。对中间保留水平的准确性数据的进一步分析表明,与包括 4、8 或 20 个单词的水平相比,2 个单词的保留水平的识别准确性更高;左半球编码的识别准确性也更高。我们的结果还表明,与 20 个单词相比,左半球编码和 40 个单词的保留水平的反应时间更慢。总之,当前的结果与费德米尔和本杰明(2005 年)的结果部分一致,并表明在语义编码言语信息方面,半球具有不同的记忆策略。