Suppr超能文献

在原发性醛固酮增多症患者中,解释肾上腺静脉样本结果的最佳标准是什么?

What is the best criterion for the interpretation of adrenal vein sample results in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism?

机构信息

Endocrine Oncology Section, Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1881-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2121-5. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with primary hyperaldosteronism, adrenal vein sampling (AVS) has emerged as a gold standard for distinguishing between unilateral and bilateral disease, but multiple criteria have been used and no consensus exists as to the most accurate criterion. The objective of this study was to determine which AVS criteria most accurately identify patients with unilateral surgical disease and are associated with significant clinical improvement after adrenalectomy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of AVS results in 108 patients with primary hyperaldosteronism treated at a single institution. Literature review of AVS criteria was used to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral disease.

RESULTS

Of the 10 AVS criteria identified in the literature, one criterion (ACTH stimulation, positioning: cortisol [adrenal]/cortisol [periphery] [Ca/Cp] > 5.0 and lateralization: aldosterone/cortisol [A/C] [dominant {D}]: A/C [nondominant {ND}] > 4:1) was the most accurate in identifying and correctly predicting lateralization of disease (P value range: < 0.001-0.0369). For this criterion, the true positive rate was 88%. The second most accurate criterion was no ACTH stimulation, positioning Ca/Cp > 1.1 and lateralization: A/C (D): A/C (ND) > 2:1. For this criterion, the overall true positive was 85%. However, we found no significant difference in clinical outcome based on individual criteria fulfillment.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the multiple criteria used for AVS evaluation, one criterion has the best accuracy. With the increasing use of AVS, there should be a consensus by which these results are evaluated and surgeons recommend adrenalectomy.

摘要

背景

在原发性醛固酮增多症患者中,肾上腺静脉取样(AVS)已成为区分单侧和双侧疾病的金标准,但已使用多种标准,并且对于最准确的标准尚无共识。本研究的目的是确定哪些 AVS 标准最能准确识别单侧手术疾病的患者,并与肾上腺切除术后的显著临床改善相关。

方法

这是对在一家机构接受治疗的 108 例原发性醛固酮增多症患者的 AVS 结果进行的回顾性分析。对文献中 AVS 标准的综述用于区分单侧和双侧疾病。

结果

在文献中确定的 10 个 AVS 标准中,有一个标准(ACTH 刺激,定位:皮质醇[肾上腺]/皮质醇[外周] [Ca/Cp] > 5.0,定位:醛固酮/皮质醇[A/C] [优势{D}]:A/C [非优势{ND}] > 4:1)在识别和正确预测疾病侧化方面最准确(P 值范围:<0.001-0.0369)。对于该标准,真阳性率为 88%。第二个最准确的标准是无 ACTH 刺激,定位 Ca/Cp > 1.1 和定位:A/C(D):A/C(ND)> 2:1。对于该标准,总体真阳性率为 85%。然而,我们发现基于各个标准的满足情况,临床结果没有显著差异。

结论

在用于 AVS 评估的多个标准中,有一个标准具有最佳的准确性。随着 AVS 的广泛应用,应该达成共识,通过该标准评估这些结果,并由外科医生推荐肾上腺切除术。

相似文献

5
Failure mode analysis in adrenal vein sampling: a single-center experience.肾上腺静脉采血中的失败模式分析:单中心经验
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.06.029. Epub 2014 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验