Suppr超能文献

选择医疗服务提供者。

Choosing a health care provider.

作者信息

Harris Katherine M, Beeuwkes Buntin Melinda

机构信息

Rand.

出版信息

Synth Proj Res Synth Rep. 2008 May(14). Epub 2008 May 16.

Abstract

In a consumer-driven health care model, consumers, armed with information, would select providers based on quality and cost, thus increasing competition. This synthesis examines the availability of quality information and the evidence of how consumers use such information to choose a provider. Key findings include: information is publicly available from multiple sources regarding hospitals, but not individual doctors. Hospital information is predominantly made available online; but this limits awareness and access. Awareness is low overall, but highest among well-educated, healthy people. Even when consumers are aware of the data available, they rarely use it because they do not find it relevant: they do not foresee needing a hospital soon; are happy with their current provider; or did not find information pertinent to their specific health condition or hospital. While there is some evidence that hospitals that do poorly on public quality scorecards lose market share, there is better evidence that the providers themselves react to the quality scores by addressing care problems. Studies consistently show that consumers value health care quality and want information, but instead they rely on input from friends, family and their personal physicians about the quality of providers.

摘要

在消费者驱动的医疗保健模式中,掌握信息的消费者会根据质量和成本选择医疗服务提供者,从而加剧竞争。本综述考察了质量信息的可得性以及消费者如何利用此类信息选择医疗服务提供者的证据。主要发现包括:关于医院的信息可从多个公开来源获取,但个体医生的信息却没有。医院信息主要通过网络提供,但这限制了人们的知晓度和获取渠道。总体知晓度较低,但在受过良好教育、身体健康的人群中最高。即便消费者知晓可用数据,他们也很少使用,因为他们觉得这些数据与己无关:他们预计短期内不需要住院;对当前的医疗服务提供者很满意;或者没有找到与自身特定健康状况或医院相关的信息。虽然有一些证据表明,在公共质量记分卡上表现不佳的医院会失去市场份额,但有更充分的证据表明,医疗服务提供者自身会通过解决医疗问题来对质量评分做出反应。研究一致表明,消费者重视医疗保健质量并希望获取相关信息,但实际上他们依赖朋友、家人及私人医生提供的关于医疗服务提供者质量的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验