Spitzer W O, Sackett D L, Sibley J C, Roberts R S, Gent M, Kergin D J, Hackett B C, Olynich A, Hay W I, Lefroy G
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 1990 Jul-Sep;2(3):93-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.1990.tb00786.x.
From July 1971, to July 1972, in a large suburban Ontario practice of two family physicians, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the effects of substituting nurse practitioners for physicians in primary-care practice. Before and after the trial, the health status of patients who received conventional care from family physicians was compared with the status of those who received care mainly from nurse practitioners. Both groups of patients had a similar mortality experience, and no differences were found in in physical functional capacity, social function or emotional function. The quality of care rendered to the two groups seemed similar, as assessed by a quantitative "indicator-condition" approach. Satisfaction was high among both patients and professional personnel. Although cost effective from society's point of view, the new method of primary care was not financially profitable to doctors because of current restrictions on reimbursement for the nurse-practitioner services.
1971年7月至1972年7月,在安大略省郊区由两名家庭医生执业的一家大型诊所中,进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估在初级保健实践中用执业护士替代医生的效果。在试验前后,将接受家庭医生常规护理的患者的健康状况与主要接受执业护士护理的患者的状况进行了比较。两组患者的死亡率相似,在身体功能能力、社会功能或情感功能方面未发现差异。通过定量的“指标状况”方法评估,两组提供的护理质量似乎相似。患者和专业人员的满意度都很高。虽然从社会角度来看具有成本效益,但由于目前对执业护士服务报销的限制,这种新的初级保健方法对医生来说在经济上并不盈利。