• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评分量表对多源反馈中初级医生评分的影响。

Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.

机构信息

Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, NHS West Midlands Workforce Deanery, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 2012 Jan;88(1035):10-4. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130010. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130010
PMID:22052883
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multi-source feedback (MSF) has an established role in the workplace based assessment of doctors in training. Different models of MSF are currently used in different training programmes and settings. One important way in which these models differ is the rating scale on which assessors score the trainee. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of rating scale on MSF scores.

METHODS

Foundation Year 2 trainees in hospitals in the West Midlands underwent MSF using the validated MSF tool, team assessment of behaviour (TAB) in autumn 2005. Trainees were scored with TAB using one of four different rating scales, ranging from 3- to 9-point scales. Each participating hospital used only one rating scale. The proportions of trainees scored as having potential problems were related to the different rating scale used. Similarly, the proportions scored as 'above expectations' were compared. Assessors also completed a short questionnaire regarding the assessment.

RESULTS

245 trainees underwent 2594 assessments. Longer rating scales were associated with a lower proportion of trainees awarded 'problem' scores and higher proportions of trainees scored as 'above expectations'. Assessors generally reported no difficulties whichever rating scale they had used.

CONCLUSION

Careful consideration, recognising its potential impact on assessment score, should be given to the rating scale used when instituting MSF within a system of workplace based assessment.

摘要

背景

多源反馈(MSF)在培训医生的工作场所评估中具有既定作用。不同的 MSF 模型目前在不同的培训计划和环境中使用。这些模型的一个重要区别是评估者对学员进行评分的评分尺度。本研究的目的是探讨评分尺度对 MSF 评分的影响。

方法

2005 年秋季,西米德兰兹医院的第二年住院医师接受了经过验证的 MSF 工具——团队行为评估(TAB)的 MSF 评估。使用 TAB 对学员进行评分,评分尺度从 3 分到 9 分不等。每个参与的医院仅使用一种评分尺度。根据使用的不同评分尺度,将被评为存在潜在问题的学员的比例进行相关比较。同样,将被评为“超出预期”的比例进行比较。评估者还就评估完成了一份简短的问卷。

结果

245 名学员接受了 2594 次评估。评分尺度越长,被评为“存在问题”的学员比例越低,被评为“超出预期”的学员比例越高。评估者报告说,无论使用哪种评分尺度,他们都没有遇到困难。

结论

在实施基于工作场所的评估系统内的 MSF 时,应慎重考虑并认识到所使用的评分尺度可能对评估评分产生的影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.评分量表对多源反馈中初级医生评分的影响。
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Jan;88(1035):10-4. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130010. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
2
Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.可能影响患者和多源反馈有效性的因素。
Med Educ. 2011 Sep;45(9):886-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04023.x.
3
User perceptions of multi-source feedback tools for junior doctors.用户对初级医生多源反馈工具的看法。
Med Educ. 2010 Feb;44(2):165-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03565.x. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
4
How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors.多源反馈评估中不同员工群体对初级医生的评分差异。
Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):516-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03333.x.
5
Workplace-based assessments of junior doctors: do scores predict training difficulties?基于工作场所的对低年资医生的评估:评分是否能预测培训困难?
Med Educ. 2011 Dec;45(12):1190-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04056.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
6
An investigation into the use of multi-source feedback (MSF) as a work-based assessment tool.一项关于将多源反馈(MSF)用作基于工作的评估工具的调查。
Med Teach. 2014 Nov;36(11):997-1004. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.909920. Epub 2014 May 7.
7
Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.确保国家项目中多源反馈的有效性。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 May;95(5):330-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.146209.
8
Republished paper: Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.再发表的论文:在国家项目中确保多源反馈的有效性。
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Sep;86(1019):526-31. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.146209rep.
9
The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups.基于能力的评估项目中多源反馈的可靠性:多次评估及评估者群体的影响。
Acad Med. 2015 Aug;90(8):1093-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000763.
10
Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers' perspectives.三种多源反馈方法比较:呼吁使用叙述性评价和同事视角。
Med Teach. 2010;32(2):141-7. doi: 10.3109/01421590903144128.

引用本文的文献

1
Feedback in Medical Education: An Evidence-based Guide to Best Practices from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine.医学教育中的反馈:急诊住院医师委员会基于证据的最佳实践指南。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 May 5;24(3):479-494. doi: 10.5811/westjem.56544.
2
Variability of residents' ratings of faculty's teaching performance measured by five- and seven-point response scales.通过五点和七点反应量表衡量的住院医师对教员教学表现评分的变异性。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02244-9.
3
Profiling postgraduate workplace-based assessment implementation in Ireland: a retrospective cohort study.
爱尔兰研究生基于工作场所评估实施情况剖析:一项回顾性队列研究
Springerplus. 2016 Feb 20;5:133. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1748-x. eCollection 2016.
4
Team assessment of behaviour: a high stakes assessment with potential for poor implementation and impaired validity.团队行为评估:一项高风险评估,存在实施不佳和效度受损的可能性。
Clin Med (Lond). 2015 Feb;15(1):7-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-7.
5
Survey and analysis of the current state of residency training in medical-school-affiliated hospitals in China.中国医学院校附属医院住院医师规范化培训现状调查分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jun 2;14:111. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-111.