• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队行为评估:一项高风险评估,存在实施不佳和效度受损的可能性。

Team assessment of behaviour: a high stakes assessment with potential for poor implementation and impaired validity.

作者信息

Whitehouse Andrew, Higginbotham Laura, Nathavitharana Kamal, Singh Baldev, Hassell Andrew

机构信息

Health Education West Midlands, Birmingham, UK

Health Education West Midlands, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2015 Feb;15(1):7-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-7.

DOI:10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-7
PMID:25650189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4954529/
Abstract

Team assessment of behaviour (TAB) is the multi-source feedback assessment of professional behaviours that all UK foundation doctors must engage in twice during their two-year programme. TAB can identify the few underperforming trainees and provide feedback to consolidate the good practice of most. For optimum validity, TAB must be undertaken by a range of assessors, as specified in the national UK Foundation Programme curriculum. This study reports an audit of invalid TAB submissions over a three-year cycle in the West Midlands' Foundation Programme. In 2010, large numbers of TABs were invalid, owing to an incorrect selection or number of assessors. Introduction of validity checking before sign-off greatly improved the numbers of valid assessments in 2011. This was partially sustained in 2012. Assurance of assessment validity is important to ensure delivery of appropriate constructive feedback and to allow early detection and remediation of signs of poor professional behaviours in foundation doctors.

摘要

团队行为评估(TAB)是对专业行为的多源反馈评估,所有英国基础医生在其两年的培训计划中必须进行两次。TAB可以识别少数表现不佳的实习生,并提供反馈以巩固大多数人的良好做法。为了获得最佳有效性,TAB必须由一系列评估人员进行,这是英国国家基础培训计划课程中规定的。本研究报告了西米德兰兹基础培训计划在三年周期内对无效TAB提交情况的审核。2010年,由于评估人员选择不当或数量错误,大量TAB无效。在签字前引入有效性检查极大地提高了2011年有效评估的数量。这一情况在2012年部分得以维持。确保评估有效性对于确保提供适当的建设性反馈以及早期发现和纠正基础医生不良专业行为的迹象非常重要。

相似文献

1
Team assessment of behaviour: a high stakes assessment with potential for poor implementation and impaired validity.团队行为评估:一项高风险评估,存在实施不佳和效度受损的可能性。
Clin Med (Lond). 2015 Feb;15(1):7-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-7.
2
Self-assessment by trainees using self-TAB as part of the team assessment of behaviour multisource feedback tool.学员使用自我 TAB 进行自我评价,作为团队行为多源反馈工具评估的一部分。
Med Teach. 2012;34(2):165-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.644840.
3
mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): a valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK?迷你同伴评估工具(mini-PAT):英国国家评估计划的一个有效组成部分?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 May;13(2):181-92. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9033-3. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
4
How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors.多源反馈评估中不同员工群体对初级医生的评分差异。
Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):516-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03333.x.
5
Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.评分量表对多源反馈中初级医生评分的影响。
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Jan;88(1035):10-4. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130010. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
6
Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training.特定专业的多源反馈:确保有效性,为培训提供信息。
Med Educ. 2008 Oct;42(10):1014-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03162.x.
7
Developing an education and assessment framework for the Foundation Programme.为基础课程开发教育与评估框架。
Med Educ. 2005 Aug;39(8):841-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02236.x.
8
Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.确保国家项目中多源反馈的有效性。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 May;95(5):330-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.146209.
9
Republished paper: Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.再发表的论文:在国家项目中确保多源反馈的有效性。
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Sep;86(1019):526-31. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.146209rep.
10
Value of supervised learning events in predicting doctors in difficulty.监督学习事件在预测困难医生方面的价值。
Med Educ. 2016 Jul;50(7):746-56. doi: 10.1111/medu.12996.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.评分量表对多源反馈中初级医生评分的影响。
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Jan;88(1035):10-4. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130010. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
2
How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors.多源反馈评估中不同员工群体对初级医生的评分差异。
Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):516-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03333.x.
3
360 degree assessment (multisource feedback) of UK trainee doctors: field testing of team assessment of behaviours (TAB).英国实习医生的360度评估(多源反馈):行为团队评估(TAB)的现场测试
Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):171-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590701302951.
4
Development and reliability testing of TAB a form for 360 degrees assessment of Senior House Officers' professional behaviour, as specified by the General Medical Council.
Med Teach. 2005 May;27(3):252-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590500047062.