Suppr超能文献

泰国人群的咬合方案。

Occlusal scheme in a group of Thais.

机构信息

Department of Masticatory Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Sep;3(3):132-5. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.3.132. Epub 2011 Sep 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To study the distribution of various occlusal schemes as well as associated static occlusal relationship among Thais.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The subjects' occlusal schemes on the left and right sides were classified as canine protected occlusion, group function, or unclassified according to the definition from Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms (8(th) edition). In addition, the presence of occlusal interferences during mandibular excursions were recorded. The measurement of the horizontal overlap and vertical overlap was also performed. Chi-square, One-way ANAVA and Mann-Whitney U statistical tests were used with level of significance set at P=.05.

RESULTS

Total of 104 subjects were included in this study. The ratio for male to female was 1.8 to 1. Average age of the population was 25.01±6.87 years old. The mean vertical overlap and horizontal overlap were 1.94±1.20 and 2.41±1.32 mm respectively. The majority of the populations (68.3%) possessed group function occlusal scheme. For the remaining, 17.3% possess canine protected occlusion and 12.5% possess combination of both occlusal schemes. We also found that occlusal interference was presented in 20.2% of the population. The most common was protrusive interference (57.14%), the second was balancing interference (38.1%) and the third was working interference (4.1%).

CONCLUSION

Among Thais, the most common occlusal scheme was group function, however there were no significant occlusal factors related to any particular occlusal scheme.

摘要

目的

研究泰国人各种咬合方案的分布以及相关的静态咬合关系。

材料和方法

根据《修复术语词汇表》(第 8 版)的定义,将研究对象的左右侧咬合方案分为尖牙保护型、组牙功能型或未分类。此外,还记录了下颌运动时是否存在咬合干扰。还进行了水平重叠和垂直重叠的测量。使用卡方检验、单因素方差分析和曼-惠特尼 U 检验,显著性水平设为 P=.05。

结果

共有 104 名受试者纳入本研究。男女比例为 1.8:1。人群的平均年龄为 25.01±6.87 岁。平均垂直重叠和水平重叠分别为 1.94±1.20 和 2.41±1.32mm。大多数(68.3%)人群具有组牙功能型咬合方案。其余人群中,17.3%具有尖牙保护型咬合方案,12.5%具有两种咬合方案的组合。我们还发现 20.2%的人群存在咬合干扰。最常见的是前伸干扰(57.14%),其次是平衡干扰(38.1%)和工作干扰(4.1%)。

结论

在泰国人中,最常见的咬合方案是组牙功能型,但没有任何特定咬合方案与咬合因素相关。

相似文献

1
Occlusal scheme in a group of Thais.泰国人群的咬合方案。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Sep;3(3):132-5. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.3.132. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
2
The influence of occlusal trauma on gingival recession and gingival clefts.咬合创伤对牙龈退缩和牙龈裂的影响。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Mar;13(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0158-1. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
6
Pattern of occlusal contacts in eccentric mandibular positions in dental students.牙科学生下颌非正中位时的咬合接触模式
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2008 Summer;2(3):85-9. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2008.018. Epub 2008 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

5
The glossary of prosthodontic terms.口腔修复学术语词汇表。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jul;94(1):10-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013.
6
OCCLUSAL RELATIONS AND MASTICATION IN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINES.澳大利亚原住民的咬合关系与咀嚼
Acta Odontol Scand. 1964 Dec;22:597-678. doi: 10.3109/00016356409058580.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验