Suppr超能文献

[全口义齿的咬合方案——文献综述]

[Occlusal schemes of complete dentures--a review of the literature].

作者信息

Tarazi E, Ticotsky-Zadok N

机构信息

Dept. of Oral Rehabilitation, The Hebrew University Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2007 Jan;24(1):56-64, 85-6.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Occlusal scheme is defined as the form and the arrangement of the occlusal contacts in natural and artificial dentition. The choice of an occlusal scheme will determine the pattern of occlusal contacts between opposing teeth during centric relation and functional movement of the mandible. With dentures, the quantity and the intensity of these contacts determine the amount and the direction of the forces that are transmitted through the bases of the denture to the residual ridges. That is why the occlusal scheme is an important factor in the design of complete dentures. Three occlusal schemes are viewed in this review: bilateral balanced occlusion, monplane occlusion, and linear occlusion scheme. Each scheme represents a different concept of occlusion. Comparisons between these schemes are also reviewed and analyzed. The reasoning underlying the bilateral balanced occlusion scheme is that stability of the dentures is attained when bilateral contacts exist throughout all dynamic and static states of the denture during function. Anatomic teeth are used: the upper anterior teeth are set to satisfy aesthetics, and the posterior teeth are arranged in a compensatory curve and a medial curve. This scheme is adequate for well developed residual ridges, with skeletal class I relation. With highly resorbed residual ridges, the vectors of force that are transmitted through anatomic cusps will dislodge the lower denture and thus impair the comfort and efficiency of mastication experienced by the patient. In order to accommodate to the special needs posed by highly resorbed residual ridges and skeletal relations that are not class I, the monoplane scheme of occlusion was designed. This scheme consists of non anatomic (cuspless) teeth, which are set so that the anterior teeth provide the aesthetics, the premolars and the first molars are used for chewing, and the second molars do not occlude (although sometimes they are specifically used to establish bilateral contacts in lateral movements). Linear occlusion scheme occludes cuspless teeth with anatomic teeth that have been modified (bladed teeth) in order to achieve linear occlusal contacts. Linear contacts are the pin-point contacts of the tips of the cusps of the bladed teeth against cuspless teeth that create a plane. The specific design of positioning upper modified teeth on the upper denture and non anatomic teeth on the lower one is called lingualized occlusion. It is characterized by contacts of only the lingual (palatinal, to be more accurate) cusps of the upper teeth with the lower teeth. The lingualized occlusal scheme provides better aesthetics than the monoplane occlusion scheme, and better stability (in the case of resorbed residual ridges) than bilateral occlusion scheme of anatomic teeth. The results of studies that compared different occlusal schemes may well be summarized as inconclusive. However, it does seem that patients preferred anatomic or semi-anatomic (modified) teeth, and that chewing efficiency with anatomic and modified teeth was better than with non anatomic teeth. Similar results were found in studies of occlusal schemes of implant-supported lower dentures opposed by complete upper dentures.

CONCLUSION

There isn't one occlusal scheme that fits all patients in need of complete dentures, in fact, in many cases more than one occlusal scheme might be adequate. Selection of an occlusal scheme for a patient should include correlation of the characteristics of the patient with those of the various occlusal schemes. The characteristics of the patient include: height and width of the residual ridge, aesthetic demands of the patient, skeletal relations (class I/II/III), neuromuscular control, and tendency for para-functional activity. The multiple characteristics of the occlusal schemes were reviewed in this article. Considering all of those factors in relation to a specific patient, the dentist should be able to decide on the most suitable occlusal scheme for the case.

摘要

未标注

咬合方案被定义为天然牙列和人工牙列中咬合接触的形式和排列。咬合方案的选择将决定下颌在正中关系和功能运动期间相对牙齿之间的咬合接触模式。对于假牙而言,这些接触的数量和强度决定了通过假牙基托传递至剩余牙槽嵴的力的大小和方向。这就是为什么咬合方案是全口义齿设计中的一个重要因素。本综述探讨了三种咬合方案:双侧平衡咬合、单平面咬合和线性咬合方案。每种方案代表了不同的咬合概念。还对这些方案之间的比较进行了综述和分析。双侧平衡咬合方案的基本原理是,当假牙在功能期间的所有动态和静态状态下都存在双侧接触时,假牙就可获得稳定性。使用解剖式牙:上颌前牙的排列要满足美观要求,而后牙则排列成补偿曲线和内侧曲线。该方案适用于发育良好的剩余牙槽嵴、骨骼关系为I类的情况。对于高度吸收的剩余牙槽嵴,通过解剖牙尖传递的力向量会使下颌假牙脱位,从而损害患者的咀嚼舒适度和效率。为了适应高度吸收的剩余牙槽嵴以及非I类骨骼关系所带来的特殊需求,设计了单平面咬合方案。该方案由非解剖式(无尖)牙组成,其排列方式为前牙提供美观效果,前磨牙和第一磨牙用于咀嚼,第二磨牙不咬合(尽管有时特意用它们来在侧方运动中建立双侧接触)。线性咬合方案是用经过改良(刃状牙)的解剖式牙与无尖牙咬合,以实现线性咬合接触。线性接触是刃状牙尖与无尖牙形成一个平面的点状接触。在上颌假牙上定位改良牙而在下颌假牙上定位非解剖式牙的具体设计被称为舌侧集中咬合。其特点是仅上颌牙齿的舌侧(更准确地说是腭侧)牙尖与下颌牙齿接触。与单平面咬合方案相比,舌侧集中咬合方案美观性更好,与解剖式牙的双侧咬合方案相比,在剩余牙槽嵴吸收的情况下稳定性更好。比较不同咬合方案的研究结果很可能尚无定论。然而,患者似乎确实更喜欢解剖式或半解剖式(改良)牙,而且解剖式牙和改良牙的咀嚼效率优于非解剖式牙。在种植体支持的下颌假牙与全口上颌假牙相对的咬合方案研究中也发现了类似结果。

结论

对于所有需要全口义齿的患者,不存在一种适用于所有人的咬合方案,事实上,在许多情况下,不止一种咬合方案可能都是合适的。为患者选择咬合方案应包括将患者的特征与各种咬合方案的特征相关联。患者的特征包括:剩余牙槽嵴的高度和宽度、患者的美观需求、骨骼关系(I/II/III类)、神经肌肉控制以及副功能活动倾向。本文综述了咬合方案的多种特征。考虑到与特定患者相关的所有这些因素,牙医应该能够为该病例确定最合适的咬合方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验