Devine Carol M, Maley Mary, Farrell Tracy J, Warren Barbour, Sadigov Shamil, Carroll Johanna
Division of Nutritional Sciences, MVR Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-4401, USA.
Eval Program Plann. 2012 Feb;35(1):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
Small Steps are Easier Together (SS) was a pilot environmental intervention in small rural worksites in Upstate New York in collaboration with Extension educators. Worksite leaders teamed with co-workers to select and implement environmental changes to increase walking steps over individual baseline and to choose healthy eating options over 10 weeks. Participants were 226 primarily white, women employees in 5 sites. A mixed methods process evaluation, conducted to identify determinants of intervention effectiveness and to explain differences in outcomes across worksites, included surveys, self-reports of walking and eating, interviews, focus groups, and an intervention log. The evaluation assessed reach, characteristics of recruited participants, dose delivered, dose received, and context and compared sites on walking and eating outcomes. Emergent elements of participant-reported dose received included: active leadership, visible environmental changes, critical mass of participants, public display of accomplishments, accountability to co-workers, and group decision making. Participants at sites with high reach and dose were significantly more likely than sites with low reach and dose to achieve intervention goals. Although this small pilot needs replication, these findings describe how these evaluation methods can be applied and analyzed in an environmental intervention and provide information on trends in the data.
携手迈出小步伐(SS)是一项与推广教育工作者合作,在纽约州北部农村小工作场所开展的试点环境干预项目。工作场所负责人与同事合作,选择并实施环境改变措施,以增加个人基线步数,并在10周内选择健康的饮食选项。参与者为5个工作场所的226名主要为白人的女性员工。为确定干预效果的决定因素并解释各工作场所结果差异而进行的混合方法过程评估,包括调查、步行和饮食的自我报告、访谈、焦点小组和干预日志。该评估评估了覆盖范围、招募参与者的特征、提供的剂量、接受的剂量以及背景,并比较了各工作场所的步行和饮食结果。参与者报告的接受剂量的新出现要素包括:积极的领导、明显的环境变化、参与者的临界数量、成就的公开展示、对同事的问责以及集体决策。覆盖范围和剂量高的工作场所的参与者比覆盖范围和剂量低的工作场所的参与者更有可能实现干预目标。尽管这个小型试点需要重复进行,但这些发现描述了如何在环境干预中应用和分析这些评估方法,并提供了数据趋势信息。