• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小型农村工作场所环境步行与健康饮食试点项目的过程评估

Process evaluation of an environmental walking and healthy eating pilot in small rural worksites.

作者信息

Devine Carol M, Maley Mary, Farrell Tracy J, Warren Barbour, Sadigov Shamil, Carroll Johanna

机构信息

Division of Nutritional Sciences, MVR Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-4401, USA.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2012 Feb;35(1):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.08.002
PMID:22054528
Abstract

Small Steps are Easier Together (SS) was a pilot environmental intervention in small rural worksites in Upstate New York in collaboration with Extension educators. Worksite leaders teamed with co-workers to select and implement environmental changes to increase walking steps over individual baseline and to choose healthy eating options over 10 weeks. Participants were 226 primarily white, women employees in 5 sites. A mixed methods process evaluation, conducted to identify determinants of intervention effectiveness and to explain differences in outcomes across worksites, included surveys, self-reports of walking and eating, interviews, focus groups, and an intervention log. The evaluation assessed reach, characteristics of recruited participants, dose delivered, dose received, and context and compared sites on walking and eating outcomes. Emergent elements of participant-reported dose received included: active leadership, visible environmental changes, critical mass of participants, public display of accomplishments, accountability to co-workers, and group decision making. Participants at sites with high reach and dose were significantly more likely than sites with low reach and dose to achieve intervention goals. Although this small pilot needs replication, these findings describe how these evaluation methods can be applied and analyzed in an environmental intervention and provide information on trends in the data.

摘要

携手迈出小步伐(SS)是一项与推广教育工作者合作,在纽约州北部农村小工作场所开展的试点环境干预项目。工作场所负责人与同事合作,选择并实施环境改变措施,以增加个人基线步数,并在10周内选择健康的饮食选项。参与者为5个工作场所的226名主要为白人的女性员工。为确定干预效果的决定因素并解释各工作场所结果差异而进行的混合方法过程评估,包括调查、步行和饮食的自我报告、访谈、焦点小组和干预日志。该评估评估了覆盖范围、招募参与者的特征、提供的剂量、接受的剂量以及背景,并比较了各工作场所的步行和饮食结果。参与者报告的接受剂量的新出现要素包括:积极的领导、明显的环境变化、参与者的临界数量、成就的公开展示、对同事的问责以及集体决策。覆盖范围和剂量高的工作场所的参与者比覆盖范围和剂量低的工作场所的参与者更有可能实现干预目标。尽管这个小型试点需要重复进行,但这些发现描述了如何在环境干预中应用和分析这些评估方法,并提供了数据趋势信息。

相似文献

1
Process evaluation of an environmental walking and healthy eating pilot in small rural worksites.小型农村工作场所环境步行与健康饮食试点项目的过程评估
Eval Program Plann. 2012 Feb;35(1):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
2
Small Steps Are Easier Together: a goal-based ecological intervention to increase walking by women in rural worksites.小步前进,携手同行:基于目标的生态干预措施,提高农村工作场所女性的步行量。
Prev Med. 2010 May-Jun;50(5-6):230-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
3
The Otsego-Schoharie healthy heart program: prevention of cardiovascular disease in the rural US.奥塞戈-肖哈里健康心脏项目:美国农村地区心血管疾病的预防
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2001;56:21-32.
4
Different outcomes for different interventions with different focus!--A cross-country comparison of community interventions in rural Swedish and US populations.针对不同重点的不同干预措施会产生不同结果!——瑞典农村和美国人群社区干预措施的跨国比较。
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2001;56:46-58.
5
Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: health works for women.针对女性蓝领工人的定制健康促进计划的效果:健康为女性服务。
Prev Med. 2002 Mar;34(3):313-23. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0988.
6
"Pizza is cheaper than salad": assessing workers' views for an environmental food intervention.“披萨比沙拉便宜”:评估员工对一项环保食品干预措施的看法。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Nov;15 Suppl 1:57S-68S. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.388.
7
The effect of a primary care exercise intervention for rural women.一项针对农村妇女的基层医疗锻炼干预措施的效果
Prev Med. 2007 Mar;44(3):198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.10.009. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
8
Promoting active transport in a workplace setting: evaluation of a pilot study in Australia.在工作场所促进主动运输:澳大利亚一项试点研究的评估
Health Promot Int. 2005 Jun;20(2):123-33. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah602. Epub 2005 Feb 18.
9
Health promotion for women with human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.针对感染人类免疫缺陷病毒或获得性免疫缺陷综合征女性的健康促进
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006 Nov;18(11):534-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00169.x.
10
Worksite study promoting activity and changes in eating (PACE): design and baseline results.工作场所促进活动与饮食变化研究(PACE):设计与基线结果
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Nov;15 Suppl 1:4S-15S. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.383.

引用本文的文献

1
Subjectively-measured Environmental Support for Physical Activity, Healthy Eating, and Breastfeeding in the Rural United States: A Scoping Review to Inform Opportunities for Public Health Surveillance.美国农村地区对体育活动、健康饮食和母乳喂养的主观测量环境支持:一项为公共卫生监测机会提供信息的范围综述
J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2025 Feb 1;5(1):31-63. eCollection 2025.
2
Who We Seek and What We Eat? Sources of Food Choice Inspirations and Their Associations with Adult Dietary Patterns before and during the COVID-19 Lockdown in New Zealand.我们在寻找什么,我们在吃什么?食物选择灵感的来源及其与新西兰 COVID-19 封锁前后成人饮食模式的关联。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 1;13(11):3917. doi: 10.3390/nu13113917.
3
Mixed methods evaluation of an employer-led, free lunch initiative in Northern Ireland.
北爱尔兰一项由雇主主导的免费午餐倡议的混合方法评估。
BMC Nutr. 2019 Dec 18;5:60. doi: 10.1186/s40795-019-0321-8. eCollection 2019.
4
Development of a Wellness Committee Implementation Index for Workplace Health Promotion Programs in Small Businesses.开发小型企业工作场所健康促进计划中健康委员会实施指数。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Jul;34(6):614-621. doi: 10.1177/0890117120906967. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Rural physical activity interventions in the United States: a systematic review and RE-AIM evaluation.美国农村地区体力活动干预措施:系统评价和 RE-AIM 评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Dec 27;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0903-5.
6
Methods used to address fidelity of receipt in health intervention research: a citation analysis and systematic review.健康干预研究中用于解决接收保真度的方法:一项引文分析与系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 18;16(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1904-6.
7
Physical Activity-Related Policy and Environmental Strategies to Prevent Obesity in Rural Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 2002-2013.2002 - 2013年预防农村社区肥胖的体育活动相关政策与环境策略:文献系统综述
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jan 7;13:E03. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150406.
8
Health promotion in small business: a systematic review of factors influencing adoption and effectiveness of worksite wellness programs.小企业中的健康促进:对影响工作场所健康计划采用率和效果的因素的系统评价
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jun;56(6):579-87. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000171.