• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of a Wellness Committee Implementation Index for Workplace Health Promotion Programs in Small Businesses.开发小型企业工作场所健康促进计划中健康委员会实施指数。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Jul;34(6):614-621. doi: 10.1177/0890117120906967. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
2
Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions in Small, Low-Wage Worksites: A Randomized Controlled Trial in King County, Washington (2014-2017).在小型低薪工作场所中推广基于证据的干预措施:华盛顿金县的一项随机对照试验(2014-2017 年)。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Dec;109(12):1739-1746. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305313. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
HealthLinks randomized controlled trial: Design and baseline results.HealthLinks随机对照试验:设计与基线结果。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 May;48:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
4
Comparing Strategies for Recruiting Small, Low-Wage Worksites for Community-Based Health Promotion Research.比较社区健康促进研究中小规模、低薪工作场所的招募策略。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Oct;45(5):690-696. doi: 10.1177/1090198118769360. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
5
Local Health Jurisdiction Staff Deliver Health Promotion to Small Worksites, Washington.当地卫生部门工作人员向小型工作场所提供健康促进服务,华盛顿州。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(2):117-124. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001105.
6
Effect of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health and Economic Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.工作场所健康计划对员工健康和经济结果的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 16;321(15):1491-1501. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3307.
7
Development and Pilot Test of the Workplace Readiness Questionnaire, a Theory-Based Instrument to Measure Small Workplaces' Readiness to Implement Wellness Programs.工作场所准备情况调查问卷的开发与预测试,这是一种基于理论的工具,用于衡量小型工作场所实施健康计划的准备程度。
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Jan;31(1):67-75. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.141204-QUAN-604. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
8
A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers to implementing worksite policies that support physical activity.一项关于促进和阻碍实施支持体力活动的工作场所政策的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Sep 27;18(1):1145. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6045-x.
9
Organizational Characteristics Influence Implementation of Worksite Health Protection and Promotion Programs: Evidence From Smaller Businesses.组织特征影响工作场所健康保护与促进计划的实施:来自小企业的证据。
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Sep;57(9):1009-16. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000517.
10
Improving low-wage, midsized employers' health promotion practices: a randomized controlled trial.改善低薪、中型雇主的健康促进实践:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2):125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Leaving no-one behind in the workplace health promotion: towards regulatory equity in the Ecuadorian micro-enterprises.在工作场所健康促进中不让任何人掉队:迈向厄瓜多尔微型企业的监管公平。
J Public Health Policy. 2024 Mar;45(1):152-163. doi: 10.1057/s41271-023-00466-x. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
Expanding Implementation Research to Prevent Chronic Diseases in Community Settings.扩大实施研究以预防社区环境中的慢性病。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:135-158. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102547. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions in Small, Low-Wage Worksites: A Randomized Controlled Trial in King County, Washington (2014-2017).在小型低薪工作场所中推广基于证据的干预措施:华盛顿金县的一项随机对照试验(2014-2017 年)。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Dec;109(12):1739-1746. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305313. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
2
Results of the Workplace Health in America Survey.美国职场健康调查结果。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jun;33(5):652-665. doi: 10.1177/0890117119842047. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
3
The development and testing of a tool to assess joint health and safety committee functioning and effectiveness.一种用于评估联合健康与安全委员会运作情况及有效性的工具的开发与测试。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Apr;60(4):368-376. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22703. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
4
HealthLinks randomized controlled trial: Design and baseline results.HealthLinks随机对照试验:设计与基线结果。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 May;48:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
5
Feasibility of Workplace Health Promotion for Restaurant Workers, Seattle, 2012.2012年西雅图餐厅员工工作场所健康促进的可行性
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Oct 8;12:E172. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150093.
6
Workplace social and organizational environments and healthy-weight behaviors.工作场所的社会和组织环境与健康体重行为。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 28;10(4):e0125424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125424. eCollection 2015.
7
Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work?工作场所健康促进(健康养生)计划是否有效?
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Sep;56(9):927-34. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000276.
8
Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update.美国成年人的多种慢性疾病:2012 年更新。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Apr 17;11:E62. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130389.
9
Promoting health and wellness in the workplace: a unique opportunity to establish primary and extended secondary cardiovascular risk reduction programs.促进工作场所的健康和健康:建立初级和扩展二级心血管风险降低计划的独特机会。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Jun;88(6):605-17. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.03.002.
10
Promoting integrated approaches to reducing health inequities among low-income workers: applying a social ecological framework.促进采用综合方法减少低收入工人的健康不平等:应用社会生态框架
Am J Ind Med. 2014 May;57(5):539-56. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22174. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

开发小型企业工作场所健康促进计划中健康委员会实施指数。

Development of a Wellness Committee Implementation Index for Workplace Health Promotion Programs in Small Businesses.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2020 Jul;34(6):614-621. doi: 10.1177/0890117120906967. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1177/0890117120906967
PMID:32077300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7305966/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To construct a wellness committee (WC) implementation index and determine whether this index was associated with evidence-based intervention implementation in a workplace health promotion program.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis of the randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Small businesses assigned to the plus WC study arm.

SAMPLE

Small businesses (20-200 employees, n = 23) from 6 low-wage industries in King County, Washington.

MEASURES

Wellness committee implementation index (0%-100%) and evidence-based intervention implementation (0%-100%).

ANALYSIS

We used descriptive and bivariate statistics to describe worksites' organizational characteristics. For the primary analyses, we used generalized estimating equations with robust standard errors to assess the association between WC implementation index and evidence-based intervention implementation over time.

RESULTS

Average WC implementation index scores were 60% at 15 months and 38% at 24 months. Evidence-based intervention scores among worksites with WCs were 27% points higher at 15 months (64% vs 37%, < .001) and 36% points higher at 24 months (55% vs 18%, < .001). Higher WC implementation index scores were positively associated with evidence-based intervention implementation scores over time ( < .001).

CONCLUSION

Wellness committees may play an essential role in supporting evidence-based intervention implementation among small businesses. Furthermore, the degree to which these WCs are engaged and have leadership support, a set plan or goals, and multilevel participation may influence evidence-based intervention implementation and maintenance over time.

摘要

目的

构建一个健康委员会(WC)实施指数,并确定该指数是否与工作场所健康促进计划中的基于证据的干预措施实施相关。

设计

随机对照试验的二次数据分析。

设置

分配给+WC 研究臂的小企业。

样本

来自华盛顿州金县 6 个低工资行业的 20-200 名员工的小企业(n=23)。

措施

健康委员会实施指数(0%-100%)和基于证据的干预实施(0%-100%)。

分析

我们使用描述性和双变量统计来描述工作场所的组织特征。对于主要分析,我们使用广义估计方程和稳健标准误差来评估 WC 实施指数与基于证据的干预措施实施随时间的关联。

结果

15 个月时的平均 WC 实施指数得分为 60%,24 个月时为 38%。有 WC 的工作场所的基于证据的干预措施得分在 15 个月时高 27 个百分点(64%比 37%,<.001),在 24 个月时高 36 个百分点(55%比 18%,<.001)。较高的 WC 实施指数得分与基于证据的干预措施实施得分呈正相关,随时间推移而增加(<.001)。

结论

健康委员会可能在支持小企业实施基于证据的干预措施方面发挥重要作用。此外,这些 WC 的参与程度以及领导层的支持、一套计划或目标以及多层次的参与程度可能会影响基于证据的干预措施的实施和维持随时间的推移。