• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生命末期的法律与癌症:致癌危害问题与死亡法的五个理想目标。

Law and cancer at the end of life: the problem of nomoigenic harms and the five desiderata of death law.

机构信息

Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney Law School, Sydney, NSW 2251, Australia.

出版信息

Public Health. 2011 Dec;125(12):905-918. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2011.10.001
PMID:22054907
Abstract

Good laws are a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for the provision of good health care. At the end of life, there is a need for laws that foster and encourage the best possible outcomes for patients, their families and healthcare professionals. This article proposes five desiderata for laws at the end of life. It uses the emerging Australian jurisprudence of end-of-life decision making to test and examine the desiderata. The article also proposes that poorly drafted and confusing laws may have a deleterious effect on patient care. These nomoigenic (law-caused) harms can be avoided by adherence to the five desiderata of death law.

摘要

好的法律是提供良好医疗保健的必要条件,但不是充分条件。在生命的尽头,需要有法律来促进和鼓励患者、他们的家人和医疗保健专业人员尽可能好的结果。本文提出了生命尽头法律的五个理想条件。它利用澳大利亚临终决策的新兴判例法来检验和审查这些理想条件。文章还提出,起草不当和令人困惑的法律可能对患者护理产生有害影响。通过遵守死亡法的五个理想条件,可以避免这些由法律引起的伤害。

相似文献

1
Law and cancer at the end of life: the problem of nomoigenic harms and the five desiderata of death law.生命末期的法律与癌症:致癌危害问题与死亡法的五个理想目标。
Public Health. 2011 Dec;125(12):905-918. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
2
Palliative care, double effect and the law in Australia.姑息治疗、双重效应与澳大利亚法律。
Intern Med J. 2011 Jun;41(6):485-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02511.x.
3
Law and public health at CDC.美国疾病控制与预防中心的法律与公共卫生
MMWR Suppl. 2006 Dec 22;55(2):29-33.
4
Community Knowledge of Law on End-of-life Decision-making: An Australian Telephone Survey.社区对临终决策法律的认知:一项澳大利亚电话调查。
J Law Med. 2019 Dec;27(2):399-414.
5
Looking beyond the law to improve end-of-life care.超越法律层面以改善临终关怀。
Generations. 1999 Spring;23(1):30-5.
6
A social work practice reflection on issues arising for LGBTI older people interfacing with health and residential care: rights, decision making and end-of-life care.关于与健康和住宿护理相关的LGBTI老年人所产生问题的社会工作实践反思:权利、决策与临终关怀。
Soc Work Health Care. 2014;53(6):568-83. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2014.914119.
7
Trends in medical end-of-life decision making in Flanders, Belgium 1998-2001-2007.比利时佛兰德斯地区 1998-2001-2007 年医疗末期决策趋势。
Med Decis Making. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):500-10. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10392379. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
8
[Preliminary proposals regarding of an italian law on end-of-life decision making].[关于意大利临终决策法的初步提案]
Recenti Prog Med. 2015 Nov;106(11):548-50. doi: 10.1701/2074.22490.
9
[French law related to patient's rights and end of life: pediatric intensive care unit's health professionals' opinions].[法国与患者权利及生命终结相关的法律:儿科重症监护病房医护人员的观点]
Arch Pediatr. 2014 Jan;21(1):34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
10
Healthy by law: the missed opportunity to use laws for public health.依法健康:利用法律促进公众健康的错失机会。
Lancet. 2012 Jan 21;379(9812):283-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60069-X. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics, orthodoxies and defensive practice: a cross-sectional survey of nurse's decision-making surrounding CPR in deceased inpatients without Do Not Resuscitate orders.伦理、正统观念与防御性医疗行为:一项关于无“不要复苏”医嘱的已故住院患者心肺复苏相关护士决策的横断面调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 May 20;26(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01224-2.
2
Better Regulation of End-Of-Life Care: A Call For A Holistic Approach.优化终末期关怀监管:呼吁采取整体方法。
J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Dec;19(4):683-693. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10213-8. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Intimacy or utility? Organ donation and the choice between palliation and ventilation.
亲密关系还是功利性?器官捐赠以及缓和治疗与通气治疗之间的抉择。
Crit Care. 2013 May 23;17(3):316. doi: 10.1186/cc12553.