• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向法院提供实施有限监护所需信息:我们做到了吗?

Giving courts the information necessary to implement limited guardianships: are we there yet?

作者信息

Gibson Laura

机构信息

Department of Social Sciences, Vincennes University-Jasper, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol Soc Work. 2011 Nov;54(8):803-18. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2011.604668.

DOI:10.1080/01634372.2011.604668
PMID:22060006
Abstract

A retrospective analysis of written court records and audiotapes of court testimony for adult guardianship cases in 2 Kentucky counties was conducted. Two hundred forty clinical assessments were reviewed for 80 court petitions. The purpose of this research was to learn how interdisciplinary assessment teams contributed to the guardianship process for older adults. Guardianship assessments and court testimony were reviewed to explore the comprehensiveness of reports to the court, the consideration of less restrictive alternatives, and the use of limited guardianships. Recommendations are given for ways in which social workers can improve information given to the courts and advocate for elders in this situation. The role of social work in this national phenomenon is discussed.

摘要

对肯塔基州两个县的成人监护案件的书面法庭记录和庭审证词录音进行了回顾性分析。对80份法庭请愿书的240份临床评估进行了审查。本研究的目的是了解跨学科评估团队如何为老年人的监护程序做出贡献。对监护评估和庭审证词进行了审查,以探讨提交给法庭的报告的全面性、对限制较少的替代方案的考虑以及有限监护的使用情况。针对社会工作者如何改进向法庭提供的信息以及在这种情况下为老年人进行辩护提出了建议。讨论了社会工作在这一全国性现象中的作用。

相似文献

1
Giving courts the information necessary to implement limited guardianships: are we there yet?向法院提供实施有限监护所需信息:我们做到了吗?
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2011 Nov;54(8):803-18. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2011.604668.
2
Substituted decision making: elder guardianship.替代决策:老年监护
J Psychiatr Pract. 2009 Nov;15(6):470-6. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000364290.86080.2f.
3
Medical decision-making during the guardianship process for incapacitated, hospitalized adults: a descriptive cohort study.失能住院成年人监护程序中的医疗决策:描述性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct;25(10):1003-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1351-8. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
4
Guardianship capacity evaluations of older adults: comparing current practice to legal standards in two states.老年人监护能力评估:比较两个州目前的做法与法律标准。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2003;15(1):97-115. doi: 10.1300/J031v15n01_06.
5
Guardianship in the elderly and the Community Care Act: more of the same?老年人监护与《社区护理法》:是否依旧如故?
Health Bull (Edinb). 2000 Nov;58(6):471-7.
6
Health care decision making for persons with disabilities. An alternative to guardianship.残疾人的医疗保健决策。监护之外的另一种选择。
JAMA. 1994 Apr 6;271(13):1017-22.
7
Judicial diagnosis. Guardianship and the incapacitated patient.司法诊断。监护与无行为能力患者。
Med Health R I. 2002 Jul;85(7):219-20.
8
[Severely demented patients no longer eats and drinks enough. Is informed consent for PEG necessary?].[严重痴呆患者不再摄入足够的饮食。经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)是否需要知情同意?]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2007 Mar 22;149(12):6.
9
Decision making for incompetent patients: who decides and by what standards?无行为能力患者的决策:由谁来决定以及依据什么标准?
Tulsa Law J. 2000 Spring-Summer;35(3-4):765-89.
10
Implementation of recommended guardianship practices and outcomes of hearings for older persons.针对老年人的推荐监护措施的实施及听证会结果
Gerontologist. 1993 Feb;33(1):81-7. doi: 10.1093/geront/33.1.81.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Adult's Competency: Application of the Competency Assessment Process.评估成年人的行为能力:行为能力评估流程的应用。
Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;2015:753873. doi: 10.1155/2015/753873. Epub 2015 Jul 15.