Suppr超能文献

向法院提供实施有限监护所需信息:我们做到了吗?

Giving courts the information necessary to implement limited guardianships: are we there yet?

作者信息

Gibson Laura

机构信息

Department of Social Sciences, Vincennes University-Jasper, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol Soc Work. 2011 Nov;54(8):803-18. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2011.604668.

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of written court records and audiotapes of court testimony for adult guardianship cases in 2 Kentucky counties was conducted. Two hundred forty clinical assessments were reviewed for 80 court petitions. The purpose of this research was to learn how interdisciplinary assessment teams contributed to the guardianship process for older adults. Guardianship assessments and court testimony were reviewed to explore the comprehensiveness of reports to the court, the consideration of less restrictive alternatives, and the use of limited guardianships. Recommendations are given for ways in which social workers can improve information given to the courts and advocate for elders in this situation. The role of social work in this national phenomenon is discussed.

摘要

对肯塔基州两个县的成人监护案件的书面法庭记录和庭审证词录音进行了回顾性分析。对80份法庭请愿书的240份临床评估进行了审查。本研究的目的是了解跨学科评估团队如何为老年人的监护程序做出贡献。对监护评估和庭审证词进行了审查,以探讨提交给法庭的报告的全面性、对限制较少的替代方案的考虑以及有限监护的使用情况。针对社会工作者如何改进向法庭提供的信息以及在这种情况下为老年人进行辩护提出了建议。讨论了社会工作在这一全国性现象中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验