Wishard Health Services, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct;25(10):1003-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1351-8. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
It is sometimes necessary for courts to appoint guardians for adult, incapacitated patients. There are few data describing how medical decisions are made for such patients before and during the guardianship process.
To describe the process of medical decision-making for incapacitated, hospitalized adults for whom court-appointed guardians are requested.
Retrospective, descriptive cohort study.
Patients were identified from the legal files of a public, urban hospital. Medical and legal records were reviewed for demographic data, code status, diagnoses, code status orders and invasive procedures and person authorizing the order or procedure, dates of incapacitation and appointment of temporary guardian, reason for guardianship, and documentation of communication with a guardian.
A total of 79 patients met inclusion criteria; 68.4% were male and 56.2% African-American. The median age was 65 years. Of the 71 patients with medical records available 89% of patients had a temporary guardianship petitioned because of the need for placement only. Seventeen patients had a new DNR order written during hospitalization, eight of which were ordered by physicians without consultation with a surrogate decision maker. Overall, 32 patients underwent a total of 81 documented invasive procedures, 16 of which were authorized by the patient, 15 by family or friend, and 11 by a guardian; consent was not required for 39 of the procedures because of emergency conditions or because a procedure was medically necessary and no surrogate decision maker was available.
Although most of the guardianships were requested for placement purposes, important medical decisions were made while patients were awaiting appointment of a guardian. Hospitalized, incapacitated adults awaiting guardianship may lack a surrogate decision maker when serious decisions must be made about their medical care.
有时法院需要为成年、无行为能力的患者指定监护人。关于此类患者在监护程序之前和期间的医疗决策过程,相关数据较少。
描述法院指定的监护人为住院的无行为能力成年患者做出医疗决策的过程。
回顾性、描述性队列研究。
从一家公立城市医院的法律档案中确定患者。对医疗和法律记录进行审查,以获取人口统计学数据、临终关怀状态、诊断、临终关怀医嘱和侵入性程序以及授权医嘱或程序的人、丧失行为能力和临时监护任命的日期、监护的原因,以及与监护人沟通的记录。
共有 79 名患者符合纳入标准;68.4%为男性,56.2%为非裔美国人。中位年龄为 65 岁。在有医疗记录的 71 名患者中,89%的患者因需要安置而申请临时监护。17 名患者在住院期间新写了一份新的 DNR 医嘱,其中 8 份医嘱是未经代理人咨询就由医生下达的。总的来说,32 名患者共进行了 81 次有记录的侵入性程序,其中 16 次由患者授权,15 次由家属或朋友授权,11 次由监护人授权;由于紧急情况或由于程序是医疗必需且没有代理人可用,39 个程序不需要同意。
尽管大多数监护权是为安置目的而提出的,但在等待监护人任命期间,仍做出了重要的医疗决策。在等待监护任命的住院无行为能力的成年患者可能在必须对其医疗做出重要决策时缺乏代理人。