Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Feb;5(1):191-200. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.965814. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
Studies in canine hearts with acute left bundle branch block (LBBB) showed that endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing improves the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared with conventional epicardial LV pacing. The present study explores the efficacy of endocardial CRT in more compromised hearts and the mechanisms of such beneficial effects.
Measurements were performed in 22 dogs, 9 with acute LBBB, 7 with chronic LBBB combined with infarction (embolization; LBBB plus myocardial infarction, and concentric remodeling), and 6 with chronic LBBB and heart failure (rapid pacing, LBBB+HF, and eccentric remodeling). A head-to-head comparison was performed of the effects of endocardial and epicardial LV pacing at 8 sites. LV activation times were measured using ≈100 endocardial and epicardial electrodes and noncontact mapping. Pump function was assessed from right ventricular and LV pressures. Endocardial CRT resulted in better electric resynchronization than epicardial CRT in all models, although the benefit was larger in concentrically remodeled LBBB plus myocardial infarction than in eccentrically remodeled LBBB+HF hearts (19% versus 10%). In LBBB and LBBB+HF animals, endocardial conduction was ≈50% faster than epicardial conduction; in all models, transmural impulse conduction was ≈25% faster when pacing from the endocardium than from the epicardium. Hemodynamic effects were congruent with electric effects.
Endocardial CRT improves electric synchrony of activation and LV pump function compared with conventional epicardial CRT in compromised canine LBBB hearts. This benefit can be explained by a shorter path length along the endocardium and by faster circumferential and transmural impulse conduction during endocardial LV pacing.
在急性左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)犬的心脏研究中,心内膜左心室(LV)起搏与传统的心外膜 LV 起搏相比,改善了心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的效果。本研究旨在探讨心内膜 CRT 在更为受损的心脏中的疗效,以及这种有益效果的机制。
本研究在 22 只狗中进行,9 只狗患有急性 LBBB,7 只狗患有慢性 LBBB 合并梗死(栓塞;LBBB 加心肌梗死和同心重构),6 只狗患有慢性 LBBB 和心力衰竭(快速起搏,LBBB+HF 和离心重构)。对心内膜和心外膜 LV 起搏在 8 个部位的效果进行了直接比较。使用约 100 个心内膜和心外膜电极和非接触式映射测量 LV 激活时间。通过右心室和 LV 压力评估泵功能。心内膜 CRT 在心内膜 CRT 改善了所有模型中的电同步,尽管在同心重构的 LBBB 加心肌梗死模型中获益大于离心重构的 LBBB+HF 心脏(19%比 10%)。在 LBBB 和 LBBB+HF 动物中,心内膜传导速度比心外膜传导速度快约 50%;在所有模型中,心内膜起搏时,跨壁冲动传导速度比心外膜起搏快约 25%。血流动力学效应与电效应一致。
在心内膜 CRT 改善了受损犬 LBBB 心脏的激活电同步和 LV 泵功能方面优于传统的心外膜 CRT。这种益处可以通过心内膜上更短的传导路径和心内膜 LV 起搏时更快的圆周和跨壁冲动传导来解释。