Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;6(4):682-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.000028. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
Simple conceptual ideas about cardiac resynchronization therapy assume that biventricular (BiV) pacing results in collision of right and left ventricular (LV) pacing-derived wavefronts. However, this concept is contradicted by the minor reduction in QRS duration usually observed. We investigated the electric mechanisms of cardiac resynchronization therapy by performing detailed electric mapping during extensive pacing protocols in dyssynchronous canine hearts.
Studies were performed in anesthetized dogs with acute left bundle-branch block (LBBB, n=10) and chronic LBBB with tachypacing-induced heart failure (LBBB+HF, n=6). Activation times (AT) were measured using LV endocardial contact and noncontact mapping and epicardial contact mapping. BiV pacing reduced QRS duration by 21±10% in LBBB but only by 5±12% in LBBB+HF hearts. Transseptal impulse conduction was significantly slower in LBBB+HF than in LBBB hearts (67±9 versus 44±16 ms, respectively), and in both groups significantly slower than transmural LV conduction (≈30 ms). In both groups QRS duration and vector and the epicardial AT vector amplitude and angle were significantly different between LV and BiV pacing, whereas the endocardial AT vector was similar. During variation of atrioventricular delay while LV pacing, and ventriculo-ventricular delay while BiV pacing, the optimal hemodynamic effect was achieved when epicardial AT and QRS vectors were minimal and endocardial AT vector indicated LV preexcitation.
Due to slow transseptal conduction, the LV electric activation sequence is similar in LV and BiV pacing, especially in failing hearts. Optimal hemodynamic cardiac resynchronization therapy response coincides with minimal epicardial asynchrony and QRS vector and LV preexcitation.
关于心脏再同步治疗的简单概念假设双心室(BiV)起搏会导致右心室(RV)和左心室(LV)起搏波前的碰撞。然而,这一概念与通常观察到的 QRS 持续时间的轻微缩短相矛盾。我们通过在患有不同步犬的心脏中进行广泛的起搏方案来进行详细的电描记术,研究心脏再同步治疗的电机制。
研究在麻醉犬中进行,包括急性左束支传导阻滞(LBBB,n=10)和慢性 LBBB 伴快起搏诱导的心力衰竭(LBBB+HF,n=6)。使用 LV 心内膜接触和非接触映射以及心外膜接触映射测量激活时间(AT)。BiV 起搏可使 LBBB 患者的 QRS 持续时间缩短 21±10%,但在 LBBB+HF 患者中仅缩短 5±12%。LBBB+HF 患者的经房间隔冲动传导明显慢于 LBBB 患者(分别为 67±9 和 44±16 ms),且均慢于 LV 心外膜传导(≈30 ms)。在两组中,LV 和 BiV 起搏之间的 QRS 持续时间和向量以及心外膜 AT 向量幅度和角度均有显著差异,而心内膜 AT 向量则相似。在 LV 起搏时改变房室延迟,在 BiV 起搏时改变室间延迟时,当心外膜 AT 和 QRS 向量最小且心内膜 AT 向量表示 LV 预激时,可获得最佳的血液动力学效果。
由于经房间隔传导缓慢,LV 和 BiV 起搏时 LV 电激活序列相似,尤其是在心力衰竭患者中。最佳的血液动力学心脏再同步治疗反应与最小的心外膜不同步和 QRS 向量以及 LV 预激相吻合。