Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
CMAJ. 2011 Dec 13;183(18):E1319-25. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110463. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
Combined oral contraceptives are a common method of contraception, but they carry a risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. We assessed whether use of drospirenone was associated with an increase in thrombotic risk relative to third-generation combined oral contraceptives.
Using computerized records of the largest health care provider in Israel, we identified all women aged 12 to 50 years for whom combined oral contraceptives had been dispensed between Jan. 1, 2002, and Dec. 31, 2008. We followed the cohort until 2009. We used Poisson regression models to estimate the crude and adjusted rate ratios for risk factors for venous thrombotic events (specifically deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and arterial thromboic events (specifically transient ischemic attack and cerebrovascular accident). We performed multivariable analyses to compare types of contraceptives, with adjustment for the various risk factors.
We identified a total of 1017 (0.24%) venous and arterial thrombotic events among 431,223 use episodes during 819 749 woman-years of follow-up (6.33 venous events and 6.10 arterial events per 10,000 woman-years). In a multivariable model, use of drospirenone carried an increased risk of venous thrombotic events, relative to both third-generation combined oral contraceptives (rate ratio [RR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.78) and second-generation combined oral contraceptives (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.02-2.65). There was no increase in the risk of arterial thrombosis with drospirenone.
Use of drospirenone-containing oral contraceptives was associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, but not transient ischemic attack or cerebrovascular attack, relative to second- and third-generation combined oral contraceptives.
口服避孕药是一种常见的避孕方法,但它有静脉和动脉血栓形成的风险。我们评估了屈螺酮的使用是否与第三代口服避孕药相比会增加血栓形成的风险。
我们使用以色列最大的医疗保健提供者的计算机记录,确定了 2002 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间为 12 至 50 岁的所有女性,这些女性均接受过口服避孕药。我们对该队列进行了随访,直到 2009 年。我们使用泊松回归模型估计静脉血栓形成事件(特别是深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞)和动脉血栓形成事件(特别是短暂性脑缺血发作和中风)的危险因素的粗率比和调整率比。我们进行了多变量分析,以比较不同类型的避孕药,并调整了各种危险因素。
在 819749 名女性随访 819749 年期间,我们共发现 431223 例使用期间的 1017 例静脉和动脉血栓形成事件(每 10000 名女性中分别有 6.33 例静脉事件和 6.10 例动脉事件)。在多变量模型中,与第三代口服避孕药(风险比[RR]1.43,95%置信区间[CI]1.15-1.78)和第二代口服避孕药(RR 1.65,95%CI 1.02-2.65)相比,使用屈螺酮会增加静脉血栓形成事件的风险。
与第二、三代口服避孕药相比,使用含有屈螺酮的口服避孕药与深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的风险增加相关,但与短暂性脑缺血发作或中风无关。