Dinger Jürgen, Möhner Sabine, Heinemann Klaas
Pharmacoepidemiology, Berlin, Germany.
ZEG - Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Berlin, Germany.
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
The "Long-term Active Surveillance Study for Oral Contraceptives" investigated the risks of long-term use of a 21-day regimen of drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (DRSP) compared to established oral contraceptives (OCs) in a routine clinical setting.
Prospective, controlled, non-interventional cohort study conducted in seven European countries with three main exposure groups: new users of DRSP, levonorgestrel-containing OCs (LNG), and OCs containing other progestogens (Other OCs). All self-reported clinical outcomes of interest (OoI) were validated via attending physicians and relevant source documents. Main OoI were serious clinical outcomes, in particular cardiovascular events. Comprehensive follow-up procedures were implemented. Statistical analyses were based on Cox regression models.
A total of 1,113 study centers enrolled 59,510 women. Overall 28%, 26% and 45% of these women used DRSP, LNG and Other OCs, respectively. Study participants were followed for up to ten years (mean value, 5.4years), which generated 318,784 woman-years (WY) of observation. Low loss to follow-up and drop-out rates of 2.9% and 16.8% were achieved. DRSP, LNG, and Other OCs showed similar incidence rates of venous thromboembolism. Corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) were close to unity. For arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) and initiation of antihypertensive treatment statistically significant lower risks were found for DRSP compared to LNG and Other OCs.
DRSP use was associated with similar general health risks and a low risk of ATE compared to OCs containing other progestogens.
The 21-day regimen of drospirenone-containing combined oral contraceptives is associated with similar risk of VTE compared to other combined oral contraceptives as well as potentially with a lower risk of ATE.
“口服避孕药长期主动监测研究”在常规临床环境中,调查了与已确立的口服避孕药(OCs)相比,长期使用21天炔诺酮和炔雌醇(DRSP)方案的风险。
在七个欧洲国家进行的前瞻性、对照、非干预性队列研究,有三个主要暴露组:DRSP新使用者、含左炔诺孕酮的OCs(LNG)和含其他孕激素的OCs(其他OCs)。所有自我报告的感兴趣的临床结局(OoI)均通过主治医生和相关原始文件进行验证。主要OoI是严重临床结局,尤其是心血管事件。实施了全面的随访程序。统计分析基于Cox回归模型。
共有1113个研究中心招募了59510名女性。总体而言,这些女性中分别有28%、26%和45%使用DRSP、LNG和其他OCs。研究参与者随访长达十年(平均值为5.4年),产生了318784女性年(WY)的观察数据。随访损失率和退出率较低,分别为2.9%和16.8%。DRSP、LNG和其他OCs的静脉血栓栓塞发生率相似。相应的风险比(HRs)接近1。对于动脉血栓栓塞事件(ATE)和开始抗高血压治疗,与LNG和其他OCs相比,DRSP的风险在统计学上显著较低。
与含其他孕激素的OCs相比,使用DRSP的总体健康风险相似,ATE风险较低。
与其他复方口服避孕药相比,含炔诺酮的复方口服避孕药21天方案的VTE风险相似,且ATE风险可能较低。