• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

必要的医疗保健和基本需求:医疗保险计划和基本福利。

Necessary health care and basic needs: health insurance plans and essential benefits.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455-0392, USA,

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2013 Dec;21(4):355-71. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0197-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-011-0197-5
PMID:22068620
Abstract

According to HealthCare.gov, by improving access to quality health for all Americans, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will reduce disparities in health insurance coverage. One way this will happen under the provisions of the ACA is by creating a new health insurance marketplace (a health insurance exchange) by 2014 in which "all people will have a choice for quality, affordable health insurance even if a job loss, job switch, move or illness occurs". This does not mean that everyone will have whatever insurance coverage he or she wants. The provisions of the ACA require that each of the four benefit categories of plans (known as bronze, silver, gold and platinum) provides no less than the benefits available in an "essential health benefits package". However, without a clear understanding of what criteria must be satisfied for health care to be essential, the ACA's requirement is much too vague and open to multiple, potentially conflicting interpretations. Indeed, without such understanding, in the rush to provide health insurance coverage to as many people as is economically feasible, we may replace one kind of disparity (lack of health insurance) with another kind of disparity (lack of adequate health insurance). Thus, this paper explores the concept of "essential benefits", arguing that the "essential health benefits package" in the ACA should be one that optimally satisfies the basic needs of the people covered.

摘要

根据 HealthCare.gov 的说法,通过改善所有美国人获得优质医疗保健的机会,平价医疗法案(ACA)将减少医疗保险覆盖范围方面的差异。在 ACA 的规定下,实现这一目标的一种方式是在 2014 年前创建一个新的医疗保险市场(医疗保险交易所),在这个市场中,“即使失业、换工作、搬家或患病,所有人都将有选择优质、负担得起的医疗保险的机会”。这并不意味着每个人都可以选择他或她想要的任何保险。ACA 的规定要求四类计划的福利类别(称为青铜、白银、黄金和白金)都提供不少于“基本健康福利套餐”中提供的福利。然而,如果没有清楚地了解什么是必要的医疗保健,那么 ACA 的要求就太模糊了,容易产生多种潜在的冲突解释。事实上,如果没有这样的理解,在急于为尽可能多的人提供医疗保险的过程中,我们可能会用另一种差距(缺乏足够的医疗保险)来取代一种差距(缺乏医疗保险)。因此,本文探讨了“基本福利”的概念,认为 ACA 中的“基本健康福利套餐”应该是能够最优化满足所覆盖人群基本需求的福利套餐。

相似文献

1
Necessary health care and basic needs: health insurance plans and essential benefits.必要的医疗保健和基本需求:医疗保险计划和基本福利。
Health Care Anal. 2013 Dec;21(4):355-71. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0197-5.
2
A Critical Analysis of Obamacare: Affordable Care or Insurance for Many and Coverage for Few?对奥巴马医改的批判性分析:是可承受的医疗保健,还是惠及多数人的保险和少数人的覆盖范围?
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):111-138.
3
Access to Neurosurgery in the Era of Narrowing Insurance Networks: Statewide Analysis of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Marketplace Plans in Arizona.在保险网络收窄的时代获取神经外科治疗服务:亚利桑那州全州范围内的《患者保护与平价医疗法案》市场计划分析
World Neurosurg. 2021 May;149:e963-e968. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.064. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
4
The association between the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and healthcare affordability among US adults with intellectual disability.《平价医疗法案》与美国成年智障人士医疗费用负担之间的关联。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2023 Dec;67(12):1270-1290. doi: 10.1111/jir.13037. Epub 2023 May 2.
5
Osteopathic medical students' understanding of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: a first step toward a policy-informed curriculum.整骨医学专业学生对《患者保护与平价医疗法案》的理解:迈向基于政策的课程体系的第一步。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015 Mar;115(3):157-65. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2015.029.
6
The ACA's pediatric essential health benefit has resulted in a state-by-state patchwork of coverage with exclusions.《平价医疗法案》的儿科基本健康福利导致了各州覆盖范围参差不齐且存在排除条款的情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Dec;33(12):2136-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0743.
7
Health insurance literacy and awareness of the Affordable Care Act in a vulnerable Hispanic population.弱势西班牙语裔人群的健康保险素养和对平价医疗法案的认知。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Dec;101(12):2233-2240. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.033. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
8
The Future of the Affordable Care Act and Insurance Coverage.《平价医疗法案》与保险覆盖范围的未来
Am J Public Health. 2017 Apr;107(4):538-540. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303665. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Three years in - changing plan features in the U.S. health insurance marketplace.三年来,美国医保市场不断调整计划特色。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3198-3.
10
Insurance Coverage and Access to Care Under the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》下的保险覆盖范围与医疗服务可及性
LDI Issue Brief. 2016 Dec;21(2):1-8.

本文引用的文献

1
(De)constructing 'basic' benefits: citizens define the limits of coverage.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):1648-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.6.1648.
2
Clinical practice. Idiopathic short stature.临床实践。特发性身材矮小。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 15;354(24):2576-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp060828.
3
Confronting utilization review in New Mexico's Medicaid mental health system: the critical role of "medical necessity".直面新墨西哥州医疗补助心理健康系统中的利用审查:“医疗必要性”的关键作用。
Med Anthropol Q. 2005 Mar;19(1):64-83. doi: 10.1525/maq.2005.19.1.064.
4
The rise and fall of managed care.管理式医疗的兴衰
J Health Soc Behav. 2004;45 Suppl:76-86.
5
The moral foundation of the clinical duties of care: needs, duties and human rights.临床护理职责的道德基础:需求、职责与人权。
Bioethics. 2001 Oct;15(5-6):520-35. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00259.
6
Justice, health, and healthcare.正义、健康与医疗保健。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Spring;1(2):2-16. doi: 10.1162/152651601300168834.
7
Can efficiency in health care be left to the market?医疗保健的效率能留给市场来决定吗?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2001 Oct;26(5):967-92. doi: 10.1215/03616878-26-5-967.
8
Health care and the prospective Pareto principle.医疗保健与预期帕累托原则。
Ethics. 1984 Jan;94(2):261-82. doi: 10.1086/292532.
9
Defining an "adequate" package of health care benefits.界定一套“足够的”医疗保健福利。
Univ PA Law Rev. 1992 May;140(5):1987-98.
10
What should count as basic health care?
Theor Med. 1983 Jun;4(2):129-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00562886.