Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术后抗生素使用时机与感染发病率:将政策改变纳入工作流程。

Timing of antibiotic administration and infectious morbidity following cesarean delivery: incorporating policy change into workflow.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 May;285(5):1219-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2133-1. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the success of a multidisciplinary approach to policy change regarding timing of antibiotic administration for the prevention of surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery.

METHODS

After review of the evidence, our multidisciplinary Obstetrics Leadership Committee decided to change policy on the timing of antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery. Using a combination of meetings, email communications, and local champions, 100% compliance with the new policy was achieved in 5 weeks. The effect of this policy change was investigated through a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing cesarean delivery at one institution from January 2009 through May 2009. Approximately halfway through the study period our department implemented a practice change that required antibiotic administration before skin incision rather than after clamping the umbilical cord. We compared the incidence of surgical-site infection, including endometritis, cellulitis, and total infectious morbidity, among women who received antibiotics before skin incision to those who received antibiotics after umbilical cord clamp.

RESULTS

There were 533 consecutive women who underwent cesarean delivery during the study period. Two hundred forty (45.0%) women received antibiotics after cord clamping, and 285 (53.5%) women received antibiotics before skin incision; timing could not be determined for 8 (1.5%) women. Within 5 weeks of the policy change, 100% of the women undergoing cesarean delivery received perioperative prophylactic antibiotics before skin incision. The incidence of infectious morbidity fell from 5.4 to 2.5% when antibiotics were given before skin incision. Compared to the administration of antibiotics before skin incision, receiving antibiotics after cord clamp yielded a crude relative risk (RR) of 2.21 (95% CI 0.89-5.44) for total infectious morbidity and 3.56 (95% CI 0.73-17.49) for endometritis. Although not statistically significant, there was an increased risk of cellulitis (RR 1.66; 95% CI 0.53-5.17) when antibiotics were administered after cord clamping.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach was successful in achieving 100% adherence to our institution's policy change regarding timing of prophylactic antibiotics. This approach was necessary in order to incorporate this type of change into the labor and delivery workflow and may serve as a paradigm for success in implementing labor and delivery quality improvement projects. In addition, administration of prophylactic antibiotics before skin incision resulted in fewer surgical-site infections following cesarean delivery. As the clinical and economic impact of surgical-site infections is considerable, the once common practice of administering antibiotics after cord clamping should be avoided.

摘要

目的

评估多学科方法在改变剖宫产术预防手术部位感染时抗生素使用时机政策方面的成功。

方法

在对证据进行审查后,我们的多学科产科领导委员会决定改变剖宫产术预防性抗生素使用时机的政策。通过会议、电子邮件通信和当地的拥护者,在 5 周内实现了新政策 100%的遵守率。通过对一家机构 2009 年 1 月至 5 月连续进行剖宫产术的患者进行前瞻性队列研究,调查了这一政策变化的效果。在研究期间的中途,我们部门实施了一项实践变更,要求在切开皮肤前而不是在夹闭脐带后给予抗生素。我们比较了在切开皮肤前接受抗生素治疗的妇女与在夹闭脐带后接受抗生素治疗的妇女的手术部位感染(包括子宫内膜炎、蜂窝织炎和总感染发病率)发生率。

结果

在研究期间,共有 533 名连续进行剖宫产术的妇女。240 名(45.0%)妇女在夹闭脐带后接受抗生素治疗,285 名(53.5%)妇女在切开皮肤前接受抗生素治疗;8 名(1.5%)妇女无法确定抗生素的使用时机。在政策变更后的 5 周内,100%接受剖宫产术的妇女在切开皮肤前接受了围手术期预防性抗生素治疗。当在切开皮肤前给予抗生素时,感染发病率从 5.4%降至 2.5%。与切开皮肤前给予抗生素相比,夹闭脐带后给予抗生素治疗的总感染发病率的粗相对风险(RR)为 2.21(95%CI 0.89-5.44),子宫内膜炎的 RR 为 3.56(95%CI 0.73-17.49)。虽然没有统计学意义,但夹闭脐带后给予抗生素治疗时,蜂窝织炎的风险增加(RR 1.66;95%CI 0.53-5.17)。

结论

多学科方法成功地实现了我们机构关于预防性抗生素使用时机政策变更的 100%遵守率。为了将这种改变纳入分娩和分娩工作流程,需要采取这种方法,并且可能成为实施分娩和分娩质量改进项目成功的典范。此外,在切开皮肤前给予预防性抗生素治疗可减少剖宫产术后的手术部位感染。由于手术部位感染的临床和经济影响相当大,因此应避免在夹闭脐带后给予抗生素的常见做法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验