Suppr超能文献

老年人使用全科医生服务的公平和平等:西班牙案例。

Equity and equality in the use of GP services for elderly people: the Spanish case.

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Extremadura, Spain.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2012 Feb;104(2):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.10.007. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To present new evidence both on the horizontal inequity in the delivery of primary health care and on the factors driving inequalities in the use of GP services for Spanish population aged 50 years and over.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study based on the Spanish sample of the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) for 2006-07. We use the index proposed by Wagstaff and van Doorslaer (HI(WV)) to compute health care inequity. The concentration index measuring income related inequality in health care use is decomposed into the contribution of each determinant.

RESULTS

Our results show the presence of pro-poor inequality in both the access and the frequency of use for GP services, which is mainly explained by unequal distribution of need factors. The contribution of non-need factors to income related inequality is quite higher for the conditional number of GP visits (48.13%) than for the probability of positive use (17.55%). We have also found significant pro-poor inequity in the probability of access to a GP and in the conditional number of visits for elderly people.

CONCLUSIONS

The relevance of social determinants of health is confirmed, and hence the need for wide-scoped public policies to reduce health inequalities. At equal levels of need, rich and poor elderly people are not treated equally. As much as appropriateness of care provided is unknown, we cannot conclude that inequity in GP services really favours the lower income individuals in terms of health gains.

摘要

目的

呈现新的证据,说明初级卫生保健提供方面的横向不公平现象,以及西班牙 50 岁及以上人群对全科医生服务使用不平等的驱动因素。

方法

基于西班牙 2006-07 年欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的横截面研究。我们使用 Wagstaff 和 van Doorslaer 提出的指数(HI(WV))来计算医疗保健不公平。衡量医疗保健使用中与收入相关的不平等的集中指数被分解为每个决定因素的贡献。

结果

我们的结果表明,在全科医生服务的获得和使用频率方面都存在有利于穷人的不平等现象,这主要是由需求因素的不平等分布造成的。非需求因素对与收入相关的不平等的贡献在条件性的全科医生就诊次数(48.13%)中比在阳性使用的可能性(17.55%)中更高。我们还发现,老年人获得全科医生服务的机会和条件性就诊次数都存在显著的有利于穷人的不平等现象。

结论

健康的社会决定因素的相关性得到了证实,因此需要广泛的公共政策来减少健康不平等。在同等需求水平下,富人和穷人的老年人没有得到平等对待。由于不知道提供的护理是否恰当,我们不能得出结论,全科医生服务的不平等真的有利于低收入个体获得健康收益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验