Anderson Oliver, Boshier Piers R, Hanna George B
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD008931. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008931.pub2.
Every patient in residential healthcare has a bed. Falling out of bed is associated with preventable patient harm. Various interventions to prevent injury are available. Bed rails are the most common intervention designed to prevent patients falling out of bed; however, their effectiveness is uncertain and bed rail entrapment can also result in injuries.
To assess the effectiveness of interventions designed to prevent patient injuries and falls from their beds.
We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 2010, Issue 2 (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), ISOI Web of Science and Web-based trials registers (all to December 2010) as well as reference lists.
Randomised controlled trials of interventions designed to prevent patient injuries from their beds which were conducted in hospitals, nursing care facilities or rehabilitation units were eligible for inclusion.
Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data from the included studies. Authors contacted investigators to obtain missing information.
Two studies met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 22,106 participants. One study tested low height beds and the other tested bed exit alarms. Both studies used standard care for their control group and both studies were conducted in hospitals. No study investigating bed rails met the inclusion criteria. Due to the clinical heterogeneity of the interventions in the included studies pooling of data and meta-analysis was inappropriate, and so the results of the studies are described.A single cluster randomised trial of low height beds in 18 hospital wards, including 22,036 participants, found no significant reduction in the frequency of patient injuries due to their beds (there were no injuries in either group), patient falls in the bedroom (rate ratio 0.69, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.34), all falls (rate ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.90) or patient injuries due to all falls (rate ratio 1.35, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.68).One randomised controlled trial of bed exit alarms in one hospital geriatric ward, involving 70 participants, found no significant reduction in the frequency of patient injuries due to their beds (there were no injuries in either group), patient falls out of bed (rate ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.24), all falls (rate ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.18) or patient injuries due to all falls (no injuries in either group).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of interventions designed to prevent patient injuries from their beds (including bed rails, low height beds and bed exit alarms) remains uncertain. The available evidence shows no significant increase or decrease in the rate of injuries with the use of low height beds and bed exit alarms. Limitations of the two included studies include lack of blinding and insufficient power. No randomised controlled trials of bed rails were identified. Future reports should fully describe the standard care received by the control group.
在住院医疗保健机构中的每位患者都有一张床。从床上跌落与可预防的患者伤害相关。有多种预防伤害的干预措施。床栏是旨在防止患者从床上跌落的最常见干预措施;然而,其有效性尚不确定,且床栏夹住患者也可能导致受伤。
评估旨在预防患者受伤及从床上跌落的干预措施的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane伤害组专业注册库、2010年第2期Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(Cochrane图书馆)、MEDLINE(Ovid)、EMBASE(Ovid)、CINAHL(EBSCO)、科学引文索引扩展版(ISI Web of Science)以及基于网络的试验注册库(均截至2010年12月),并查阅了参考文献列表。
在医院、护理机构或康复单位进行的旨在预防患者从床上受伤的干预措施的随机对照试验符合纳入标准。
两位综述作者独立评估偏倚风险并从纳入研究中提取数据。作者联系研究者以获取缺失信息。
两项研究符合纳入标准,共涉及22106名参与者。一项研究测试了低高度床,另一项研究测试了床边离床警报器。两项研究的对照组均采用标准护理,且两项研究均在医院进行。没有关于床栏的研究符合纳入标准。由于纳入研究中干预措施的临床异质性,数据合并和荟萃分析并不合适,因此描述了这些研究的结果。一项在18个医院病房进行的关于低高度床的单组整群随机试验,包括22036名参与者,发现因床导致的患者受伤频率(两组均无受伤情况)、卧室中的患者跌倒(率比0.69,95%可信区间0.35至1.34)、所有跌倒(率比1.26,95%可信区间0.83至1.90)或因所有跌倒导致的患者受伤(率比1.35,95%可信区间0.68至2.68)均无显著降低。一项在一家医院老年病房进行的关于床边离床警报器的随机对照试验,涉及70名参与者,发现因床导致的患者受伤频率(两组均无受伤情况)、患者从床上跌落(率比0.25,95%可信区间0.03至2.24)、所有跌倒(率比0.42,95%可信区间0.15至1.18)或因所有跌倒导致的患者受伤(两组均无受伤情况)均无显著降低。
旨在预防患者从床上受伤的干预措施(包括床栏、低高度床和床边离床警报器)的有效性仍不确定。现有证据表明,使用低高度床和床边离床警报器时,受伤率没有显著增加或降低。两项纳入研究的局限性包括缺乏盲法和检验效能不足。未找到关于床栏的随机对照试验。未来报告应充分描述对照组接受的标准护理。