Suppr超能文献

创伤后24小时内的弥散性血管内凝血:国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)评分与解剖病理学证据之间的关联

Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy in the first 24 hours after trauma: the association between ISTH score and anatomopathologic evidence.

作者信息

Rizoli Sandro, Nascimento Bartolomeu, Key Nigel, Tien Homer C, Muraca Sergio, Pinto Ruxandra, Khalifa Mahmoud, Plotkin Anna, Callum Jeannie

机构信息

Tory Trauma Centre, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5 Suppl 1):S441-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318232e688.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies questioned "classical" concepts in trauma care, including whether disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) occurs in trauma. The knowledge on trauma DIC is limited to few studies built on diagnosing DIC with laboratory-based scores. This study explores whether DIC diagnosed by the well-established ISTH (International Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis) score is corroborated by anatomopathologic findings.

METHODS

Prospective observational cohort study of severely injured (ISS ≥ 16) patients. DIC was diagnosed by the ISTH score throughout the first 24 hours after trauma. All organs surgically removed within 24 hours of trauma were reviewed by two independent pathologists. All autopsy reports were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 423 patients enrolled, ∼11% had "overt DIC" and 85% had "suggestive of non-overt DIC" scores throughout the 24 hours after trauma. "Overt DIC" patients had higher mortality and worse bleeding, receiving more blood and plasma transfusions. One hundred and sixteen patients underwent surgery within 24 hours of trauma, and all 40 excised organs were reviewed by two pathologists. Twenty-seven autopsies reports were reviewed. No anatomopathologic evidence of DIC was identified in the first 24 hours, even after additional histochemical staining. d-dimer was universally elevated after trauma. Common DIC features: platelet count, fibrinogen, clotting time, and factor VIII drop were mostly absent.

CONCLUSIONS

d-dimer has a disproportional participation in trauma DIC scores. Within 24 hours of trauma, most severely injured patients have DIC scores "suggestive for" or of "overt DIC" but no anatomopathologic evidence of DIC. Considering pathologic findings as the gold standard diagnosis, then DIC is exceptionally uncommon and the ISTH score should not be used for trauma.

摘要

背景

近期研究对创伤治疗中的“经典”概念提出质疑,包括创伤患者是否会发生弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)。关于创伤性DIC的知识仅限于少数基于实验室评分诊断DIC的研究。本研究探讨通过成熟的国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)评分诊断的DIC是否能得到解剖病理学结果的证实。

方法

对重伤(损伤严重度评分[ISS]≥16)患者进行前瞻性观察队列研究。在创伤后的最初24小时内,通过ISTH评分诊断DIC。两名独立病理学家对创伤后24小时内手术切除的所有器官进行检查。查阅所有尸检报告。

结果

在纳入的423例患者中,约11%在创伤后的24小时内有“显性DIC”,85%有“提示非显性DIC”评分。“显性DIC”患者死亡率更高,出血情况更严重,接受更多的血液和血浆输注。116例患者在创伤后24小时内接受手术,两名病理学家对所有40个切除器官进行了检查。查阅了27份尸检报告。即使进行额外的组织化学染色,在最初24小时内也未发现DIC的解剖病理学证据。创伤后D-二聚体普遍升高。常见的DIC特征(血小板计数、纤维蛋白原、凝血时间和因子VIII下降)大多不存在。

结论

D-二聚体在创伤性DIC评分中的参与程度不成比例。在创伤后的24小时内,大多数重伤患者有“提示为”或“显性DIC”的DIC评分,但没有DIC的解剖病理学证据。将病理结果视为金标准诊断,那么DIC极为罕见,ISTH评分不应应用于创伤患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验